Estimating bicycle route choice model in value-of-time space, a case study for Gothenburg

Chengxi Liu , Fredrik Johansson , Ida Kristoffersson , Clas Rydergren
{"title":"Estimating bicycle route choice model in value-of-time space, a case study for Gothenburg","authors":"Chengxi Liu ,&nbsp;Fredrik Johansson ,&nbsp;Ida Kristoffersson ,&nbsp;Clas Rydergren","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies that have estimated bicycle route choice models have focused on the preference valuations in the Value-of-distance space (VoD), i.e., the valuation of a potential investment in infrastructure relative to the reference infrastructure is measured in the unit of travel distance. That is to say, one meter of cycling on separated bike path is equivalent to <em>x</em> meters of cycling in mixed traffic (reference). This paper presents an effort to estimate a bicycle route choice model in Greater Gothenburg area where the utility is specified in the Value-of-Time space (VoT), which assumes that cyclists primarily aim to minimize travel time rather than distance per se. Estimation in VoT space also allows for the use of model estimation results in Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) given that most benefits in CBA are measured in terms of travel time savings. To achieve this, travel time, desired speed and delays at intersections are estimated from GPS data. A Path-size Logit model is developed where a utility function for each alternative (route) is formulated using travel time rather than distance. Desired speed and delay at intersections are estimated at trip level and intersection level. The estimated preference weights in the VoT space are compared with the estimates in the VoD space using the same data and from the literature. Results suggest that valuation of separated bike path in VoT space is comparable to VoD space using the same dataset but lower than the ones in VoD space in literature. The valuation of very steep slope (&gt;5 %) in VoT space is substantially lower. Commuting cyclists slightly more prefer separated bike path and have a substantially stronger preference for avoiding signalized intersections than non-commuting trips.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105925000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies that have estimated bicycle route choice models have focused on the preference valuations in the Value-of-distance space (VoD), i.e., the valuation of a potential investment in infrastructure relative to the reference infrastructure is measured in the unit of travel distance. That is to say, one meter of cycling on separated bike path is equivalent to x meters of cycling in mixed traffic (reference). This paper presents an effort to estimate a bicycle route choice model in Greater Gothenburg area where the utility is specified in the Value-of-Time space (VoT), which assumes that cyclists primarily aim to minimize travel time rather than distance per se. Estimation in VoT space also allows for the use of model estimation results in Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) given that most benefits in CBA are measured in terms of travel time savings. To achieve this, travel time, desired speed and delays at intersections are estimated from GPS data. A Path-size Logit model is developed where a utility function for each alternative (route) is formulated using travel time rather than distance. Desired speed and delay at intersections are estimated at trip level and intersection level. The estimated preference weights in the VoT space are compared with the estimates in the VoD space using the same data and from the literature. Results suggest that valuation of separated bike path in VoT space is comparable to VoD space using the same dataset but lower than the ones in VoD space in literature. The valuation of very steep slope (>5 %) in VoT space is substantially lower. Commuting cyclists slightly more prefer separated bike path and have a substantially stronger preference for avoiding signalized intersections than non-commuting trips.
基于时间空间价值的自行车路径选择模型估计——以哥德堡市为例
以往估算自行车路线选择模型的研究主要集中在距离价值空间(Value-of-distance space, VoD)中的偏好估值,即以旅行距离为单位衡量基础设施相对于参考基础设施的潜在投资估值。也就是说,在分开的自行车道上骑行1米,相当于在混合交通中骑行x米(参考文献)。本文提出了一种估算大哥德堡地区自行车路线选择模型的努力,该模型的效用是在时间空间价值(VoT)中指定的,该模型假设骑自行车者的主要目标是最小化旅行时间而不是距离本身。VoT空间中的估计还允许在成本效益分析(CBA)中使用模型估计结果,因为CBA中的大多数效益是根据节省的旅行时间来衡量的。为了实现这一目标,从GPS数据中估计旅行时间、期望速度和十字路口的延误。开发了路径大小Logit模型,其中每个备选(路线)的效用函数使用旅行时间而不是距离来制定。期望的速度和延迟在交叉口估计在旅行水平和交叉口水平。将VoT空间中估计的偏好权重与使用相同数据和来自文献的VoD空间中的估计进行比较。结果表明,在相同数据集下,VoT空间中分离自行车道的估值与VoD空间相当,但低于文献中VoD空间的估值。非常陡斜率(>5 %)在VoT空间中的估值要低得多。通勤骑自行车的人比非通勤骑自行车的人更喜欢独立的自行车道,并且更倾向于避开有信号的十字路口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信