{"title":"Towards visual-symbolic integration in the Soar cognitive architecture","authors":"James Boggs","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computational models of visual reasoning are largely separate from models of non-visual reasoning and include only enough high-level reasoning to perform specific visual reasoning tasks, such as Raven’s progressive matrices or visual question answering. Although these models perform well at the pure visual reasoning tasks for which they are designed, their lack of a connection with a general-purpose high-level reasoning system means they cannot be applied to tasks requiring <em>deliberate</em> reasoning about both visual and non-visual knowledge. Simultaneously, many of the most mature and heavily studied cognitive architectures (e.g., Soar, ACT-R) feature only partial visual reasoning capabilities or none at all. This work describes initial efforts to create a visual reasoning system tightly integrated with a broader reasoning system by extending the Soar cognitive architecture with low-level visual memories and reasoning processes, and an evaluation of this system on tasks in a simple domain. Its ultimate aim is to demonstrate a path towards accommodating multiple levels of visual knowledge representations within an otherwise mostly symbolic, rules-based architecture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 101353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Computational models of visual reasoning are largely separate from models of non-visual reasoning and include only enough high-level reasoning to perform specific visual reasoning tasks, such as Raven’s progressive matrices or visual question answering. Although these models perform well at the pure visual reasoning tasks for which they are designed, their lack of a connection with a general-purpose high-level reasoning system means they cannot be applied to tasks requiring deliberate reasoning about both visual and non-visual knowledge. Simultaneously, many of the most mature and heavily studied cognitive architectures (e.g., Soar, ACT-R) feature only partial visual reasoning capabilities or none at all. This work describes initial efforts to create a visual reasoning system tightly integrated with a broader reasoning system by extending the Soar cognitive architecture with low-level visual memories and reasoning processes, and an evaluation of this system on tasks in a simple domain. Its ultimate aim is to demonstrate a path towards accommodating multiple levels of visual knowledge representations within an otherwise mostly symbolic, rules-based architecture.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.