Machine learning models for predicting volumetric errors based on scale and master balls artefact probing data

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Min Zeng , Miao Feng , J.R.R. Mayer , Elie Bitar-Nehme , Xuan Truong Duong
{"title":"Machine learning models for predicting volumetric errors based on scale and master balls artefact probing data","authors":"Min Zeng ,&nbsp;Miao Feng ,&nbsp;J.R.R. Mayer ,&nbsp;Elie Bitar-Nehme ,&nbsp;Xuan Truong Duong","doi":"10.1016/j.cirpj.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volumetric accuracy of machine tools is important to both machine tool manufacturers and users. Predicting volumetric errors (VEs) is a pre-requisite for their compensation yielding increased dimensional quality of machined parts. However, predicting VEs in five-axis machine tools is challenging due to the complexity of error sources and their associated physics-based model. Machine learning (ML) is used to predict VEs under no load and stable thermal conditions. Data is acquired using a scale and master ball artefact (SAMBA) and on-machine touch probing. A general process for determining the minimum number of balls required to generate data to satisfactorily train an ML model is proposed. The VEs prediction is verified using synthetic data for inter-axis and some intra-axis geometric errors, and then validated using only experimental data. Different datasets based on decreasing number of balls are tested to train either a Neural Networks (NN) or an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to compare their performances. The results show that, both NN and XGBoost are effective to predict VEs of a five-axis machine tool with wCBXfZY(S)t topology regardless of the geometric error parameter values. By using only experimental data of twenty balls to train the models, XGBoost outperforms NN in all four error metrics and processing time. A time efficient scheme was tested whereby only two master balls plus one scale bar dataset and an additional master ball (when only the spindle rotates) were used for training NN.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56011,"journal":{"name":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 135-157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755581725000343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volumetric accuracy of machine tools is important to both machine tool manufacturers and users. Predicting volumetric errors (VEs) is a pre-requisite for their compensation yielding increased dimensional quality of machined parts. However, predicting VEs in five-axis machine tools is challenging due to the complexity of error sources and their associated physics-based model. Machine learning (ML) is used to predict VEs under no load and stable thermal conditions. Data is acquired using a scale and master ball artefact (SAMBA) and on-machine touch probing. A general process for determining the minimum number of balls required to generate data to satisfactorily train an ML model is proposed. The VEs prediction is verified using synthetic data for inter-axis and some intra-axis geometric errors, and then validated using only experimental data. Different datasets based on decreasing number of balls are tested to train either a Neural Networks (NN) or an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to compare their performances. The results show that, both NN and XGBoost are effective to predict VEs of a five-axis machine tool with wCBXfZY(S)t topology regardless of the geometric error parameter values. By using only experimental data of twenty balls to train the models, XGBoost outperforms NN in all four error metrics and processing time. A time efficient scheme was tested whereby only two master balls plus one scale bar dataset and an additional master ball (when only the spindle rotates) were used for training NN.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
166
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology (CIRP-JMST) publishes fundamental papers on manufacturing processes, production equipment and automation, product design, manufacturing systems and production organisations up to the level of the production networks, including all the related technical, human and economic factors. Preference is given to contributions describing research results whose feasibility has been demonstrated either in a laboratory or in the industrial praxis. Case studies and review papers on specific issues in manufacturing science and technology are equally encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信