Our initial experience with rapid enzymatic debriding agent for burn eschar: Case series from an ABA verified burn center

Q3 Medicine
Cole L. Bird , Yair Saucedo , Jessica Reynolds , Dhaval Bhavsar
{"title":"Our initial experience with rapid enzymatic debriding agent for burn eschar: Case series from an ABA verified burn center","authors":"Cole L. Bird ,&nbsp;Yair Saucedo ,&nbsp;Jessica Reynolds ,&nbsp;Dhaval Bhavsar","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We reviewed 14 consecutive patients at our ABA-verified burn center who received enzymatic debridement with anacaulase-bcdb (NexoBrid®) from January 2020 to May 2023. These patients, part of the NEXT study, had deep partial or full-thickness burns. We aimed to evaluate NexoBrid’s effect on eschar removal, wound healing, surgical needs, and scar quality.</div><div>Data included total body surface area (TBSA) burned, enzymatically treated area, amount of NexoBrid used, grafting details, time to healing, and scar characteristics. Analysis was descriptive, reporting medians, ranges, and percentages.</div><div>All 14 patients achieved ≥ 95 % eschar removal with a single NexoBrid application. Their ages ranged from 15–65 years, and mean burn size was 9.25 % TBSA. Eight patients required grafting, but these grafts covered only about 60 % of the treated area. Time to 95 % wound closure averaged 36 days. Scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale showed improvement from a mean score of 3.8 at three months to 0.5 at twelve months. Despite this, four patients developed hypertrophic scars and one required intervention for a contracture.</div><div>In summary, NexoBrid facilitated rapid, consistent non-surgical eschar removal, timely wound closure, and favorable scar outcomes within one year. In nearly half of the patients, it eliminated the need for skin grafting. Among those who did require grafts, smaller graft areas were needed. These findings suggest that early eschar removal and dermal preservation contribute to improved outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts will help confirm these results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912225000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reviewed 14 consecutive patients at our ABA-verified burn center who received enzymatic debridement with anacaulase-bcdb (NexoBrid®) from January 2020 to May 2023. These patients, part of the NEXT study, had deep partial or full-thickness burns. We aimed to evaluate NexoBrid’s effect on eschar removal, wound healing, surgical needs, and scar quality.
Data included total body surface area (TBSA) burned, enzymatically treated area, amount of NexoBrid used, grafting details, time to healing, and scar characteristics. Analysis was descriptive, reporting medians, ranges, and percentages.
All 14 patients achieved ≥ 95 % eschar removal with a single NexoBrid application. Their ages ranged from 15–65 years, and mean burn size was 9.25 % TBSA. Eight patients required grafting, but these grafts covered only about 60 % of the treated area. Time to 95 % wound closure averaged 36 days. Scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale showed improvement from a mean score of 3.8 at three months to 0.5 at twelve months. Despite this, four patients developed hypertrophic scars and one required intervention for a contracture.
In summary, NexoBrid facilitated rapid, consistent non-surgical eschar removal, timely wound closure, and favorable scar outcomes within one year. In nearly half of the patients, it eliminated the need for skin grafting. Among those who did require grafts, smaller graft areas were needed. These findings suggest that early eschar removal and dermal preservation contribute to improved outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts will help confirm these results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信