Amanuel Bersisa , Ki-Yeon Moon , G.M. Kim , Jin-Sang Cho , Solmoi Park
{"title":"Influence of hydraulic cement substitutes on carbonation of calcium silicate cement","authors":"Amanuel Bersisa , Ki-Yeon Moon , G.M. Kim , Jin-Sang Cho , Solmoi Park","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhancing the early-age carbonation efficiency and the setting time of calcium silicate cement (CSC) are crucial for its application as a nonhydraulic binder. This study investigates the carbonation efficiency of CSC blended with hydraulic cement substitutes, including Portland cement (PC), calcium aluminate cement (CAC) and calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA). Samples were made with 0 %, 10 %, 30 % and 50 % replacement with hydraulic binders and were cured in 20 % CO₂ environment. The carbonation products were characterized microscopically using TGA, XRD and FT-IR, along with compressive strength test. The results revealed that hydrated CSC-PC is mainly characterized by amorphous content, primarily attributed to C–S–H. Meanwhile, samples incorporating CAC and CSA precipitated C₂ASH₈, C₃AH₆ and C₄A$H₁₂ phases. However, carbonation destabilized these phases while precipitating significant CaCO₃ content, a phase that ensures strength development in CO₂-based binders. Incorporation of 30 % CAC and CSA has ensured precipitation of 14.5 g and 34 g per 100 g binder of CaCO₃ after 6 h of carbonation, while the content was lower in pure CSC and CSC-PC samples. After 168 h of CO₂-curing, the amount of unreacted clinker was nearly reduced by half when 50 % of CSC was substituted by hydraulic cement, increasing the compressive strength by 230 %, particularly for CAC- and CSA-containing samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"473 ","pages":"Article 140800"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825009481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhancing the early-age carbonation efficiency and the setting time of calcium silicate cement (CSC) are crucial for its application as a nonhydraulic binder. This study investigates the carbonation efficiency of CSC blended with hydraulic cement substitutes, including Portland cement (PC), calcium aluminate cement (CAC) and calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA). Samples were made with 0 %, 10 %, 30 % and 50 % replacement with hydraulic binders and were cured in 20 % CO₂ environment. The carbonation products were characterized microscopically using TGA, XRD and FT-IR, along with compressive strength test. The results revealed that hydrated CSC-PC is mainly characterized by amorphous content, primarily attributed to C–S–H. Meanwhile, samples incorporating CAC and CSA precipitated C₂ASH₈, C₃AH₆ and C₄A$H₁₂ phases. However, carbonation destabilized these phases while precipitating significant CaCO₃ content, a phase that ensures strength development in CO₂-based binders. Incorporation of 30 % CAC and CSA has ensured precipitation of 14.5 g and 34 g per 100 g binder of CaCO₃ after 6 h of carbonation, while the content was lower in pure CSC and CSC-PC samples. After 168 h of CO₂-curing, the amount of unreacted clinker was nearly reduced by half when 50 % of CSC was substituted by hydraulic cement, increasing the compressive strength by 230 %, particularly for CAC- and CSA-containing samples.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.