{"title":"Investigating Adolescents’ Execution Speed of Social, Dimensional, and Temporal Comparisons","authors":"Jennifer Schumacher, Hella Hörsch, Fabian Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons influence students’ academic self-concepts to different degrees. Typically, social comparison effects are stronger than dimensional comparison effects, which in turn are stronger than temporal comparison effects. A possible explanation for these different comparison effects could be differences in the cognitive processes involved in social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons. To gain insight into this issue, the present study addresses the execution speed of social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons using a response time experiment, in which <em>N =</em> 209 students (9th and 10th grade) were asked to evaluate their achievements in various subjects in relation to social, dimensional, and temporal comparison standards. Response times to social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons were compared using a repeated measures ANOVA and were found to be shortest for temporal comparisons and longest for social comparisons. Moreover, they were shorter when comparisons used non-specific comparison standards (i.e., multiple people/subjects/points in time) compared to specific comparison standards (i.e., single person/subject/point in time). Accordingly, temporal comparisons appear to facilitate the fastest execution speed, followed by dimensional comparisons, and then social comparisons. Furthermore, non-specific comparisons appear to facilitate a faster execution speed than specific comparisons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X2500027X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons influence students’ academic self-concepts to different degrees. Typically, social comparison effects are stronger than dimensional comparison effects, which in turn are stronger than temporal comparison effects. A possible explanation for these different comparison effects could be differences in the cognitive processes involved in social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons. To gain insight into this issue, the present study addresses the execution speed of social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons using a response time experiment, in which N = 209 students (9th and 10th grade) were asked to evaluate their achievements in various subjects in relation to social, dimensional, and temporal comparison standards. Response times to social, dimensional, and temporal comparisons were compared using a repeated measures ANOVA and were found to be shortest for temporal comparisons and longest for social comparisons. Moreover, they were shorter when comparisons used non-specific comparison standards (i.e., multiple people/subjects/points in time) compared to specific comparison standards (i.e., single person/subject/point in time). Accordingly, temporal comparisons appear to facilitate the fastest execution speed, followed by dimensional comparisons, and then social comparisons. Furthermore, non-specific comparisons appear to facilitate a faster execution speed than specific comparisons.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.