Angel Aledo-Serrano , Susana Boronat , Juan José García-Peñas , Adrián García-Ron , Antonio Gil-Nagel , Juan Jesús Rodríguez Uranga , Rocio Sánchez-Carpintero , Patricia Smeyers , Vicente Villanueva
{"title":"Delphi consensus on referral criteria for pediatric patients with suspected Dravet syndrome","authors":"Angel Aledo-Serrano , Susana Boronat , Juan José García-Peñas , Adrián García-Ron , Antonio Gil-Nagel , Juan Jesús Rodríguez Uranga , Rocio Sánchez-Carpintero , Patricia Smeyers , Vicente Villanueva","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to establish referral criteria, based on the Hattori precedent, to assist in the easy identification and referral of pediatric patients with suspected Dravet syndrome (DS) at first-line care facilities to support early diagnosis and appropriate management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DS referral criteria were developed by a Scientific Committee (SC) of 9 epilepsy specialists by consensus review. These criteria were evaluated for suitability by an Expert Panel (EP) comprising 10 frontline healthcare professionals not specialized in epilepsy using a conventional two-phase Delphi methodology. Results were evaluated using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four DS referral criteria were proposed by the SC, including: (1) history of prolonged febrile/non-febrile seizures before one year of age; (2) history of different types of non-febrile seizures before one year of age; (3) history of seizures sensitive to temperature changes before one year of age; and (4) neurodevelopmental disorders without previous signs or regression. Genetic criteria were excluded due to lack of availability of tests for frontline professionals. The EP rated all four criteria as appropriate for use by frontline professionals (A), with a high degree of consensus (median score 6–9) across four dimensions (“ease of identification”, “relevance”, “feasibility of referral if one criterion met”, and “feasibility of referral if > 1 criterion met”).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A set of DS referral criteria has been identified and validated for use by non-epilepsy-specialized professionals within the framework of current clinical practice. The adapted criteria could be effective and beneficial for incorporation into existing care protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 110401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025001404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to establish referral criteria, based on the Hattori precedent, to assist in the easy identification and referral of pediatric patients with suspected Dravet syndrome (DS) at first-line care facilities to support early diagnosis and appropriate management.
Methods
DS referral criteria were developed by a Scientific Committee (SC) of 9 epilepsy specialists by consensus review. These criteria were evaluated for suitability by an Expert Panel (EP) comprising 10 frontline healthcare professionals not specialized in epilepsy using a conventional two-phase Delphi methodology. Results were evaluated using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry method.
Results
Four DS referral criteria were proposed by the SC, including: (1) history of prolonged febrile/non-febrile seizures before one year of age; (2) history of different types of non-febrile seizures before one year of age; (3) history of seizures sensitive to temperature changes before one year of age; and (4) neurodevelopmental disorders without previous signs or regression. Genetic criteria were excluded due to lack of availability of tests for frontline professionals. The EP rated all four criteria as appropriate for use by frontline professionals (A), with a high degree of consensus (median score 6–9) across four dimensions (“ease of identification”, “relevance”, “feasibility of referral if one criterion met”, and “feasibility of referral if > 1 criterion met”).
Conclusions
A set of DS referral criteria has been identified and validated for use by non-epilepsy-specialized professionals within the framework of current clinical practice. The adapted criteria could be effective and beneficial for incorporation into existing care protocols.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.