Organic amendments restore soil biological properties under pesticides application

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ahmad Latif Virk , Awais Shakoor , Naeem Ahmad , Huaqiang Du , Scott X. Chang , Yanjiang Cai
{"title":"Organic amendments restore soil biological properties under pesticides application","authors":"Ahmad Latif Virk ,&nbsp;Awais Shakoor ,&nbsp;Naeem Ahmad ,&nbsp;Huaqiang Du ,&nbsp;Scott X. Chang ,&nbsp;Yanjiang Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pesticides are indispensable in modern agriculture, but they also affect soil biological properties and soil sustainability. Although organic amendments (OAs) have the potential to alleviate the negative effects of pesticides and restore soil biological properties, but results have been inconsistent. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the overall effects of OAs on soil biological properties under pesticide application. Our results showed that sole pesticide application significantly decreased soil enzymatic activities (i.e., by −2.5 % for urease, −22 % for β-glucosidase, and − 10 % for dehydrogenase) and reduced microbial population size (e.g., by −6 % for microbial biomass, −10 % for actinomycetes population, −7 % for bacteria and − 12 % for fungi population). Noticeably, sole fungicide application did not significantly affect soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes populations as compared to sole herbicide and insecticide. In contrast, pesticide with OAs application significantly increased soil respiration (+60 %), activities of dehydrogenase (+73 %), urease (+80 %) and β-glucosidase (+65 %), microbial biomass (+79 %), bacterial (+65 %) and fungal (+13 %) population sizes than sole pesticide. However, soil acid phosphatase activity significantly decreased (−17 %) by using pesticide with OAs. Our results suggest that OAs in combination with pesticides can modify soil physicochemical properties and subsequently restore soil biological properties, but the magnitude of improvement of specific OAs in combination with individual pesticide classes remains unknown and should be studied in future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 106394"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357525001075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pesticides are indispensable in modern agriculture, but they also affect soil biological properties and soil sustainability. Although organic amendments (OAs) have the potential to alleviate the negative effects of pesticides and restore soil biological properties, but results have been inconsistent. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the overall effects of OAs on soil biological properties under pesticide application. Our results showed that sole pesticide application significantly decreased soil enzymatic activities (i.e., by −2.5 % for urease, −22 % for β-glucosidase, and − 10 % for dehydrogenase) and reduced microbial population size (e.g., by −6 % for microbial biomass, −10 % for actinomycetes population, −7 % for bacteria and − 12 % for fungi population). Noticeably, sole fungicide application did not significantly affect soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes populations as compared to sole herbicide and insecticide. In contrast, pesticide with OAs application significantly increased soil respiration (+60 %), activities of dehydrogenase (+73 %), urease (+80 %) and β-glucosidase (+65 %), microbial biomass (+79 %), bacterial (+65 %) and fungal (+13 %) population sizes than sole pesticide. However, soil acid phosphatase activity significantly decreased (−17 %) by using pesticide with OAs. Our results suggest that OAs in combination with pesticides can modify soil physicochemical properties and subsequently restore soil biological properties, but the magnitude of improvement of specific OAs in combination with individual pesticide classes remains unknown and should be studied in future research.

Abstract Image

施用农药后,有机改进剂可恢复土壤的生物特性
农药在现代农业中不可或缺,但同时也影响着土壤的生物特性和土壤的可持续性。虽然有机改良剂(OAs)有可能减轻农药的负面影响,恢复土壤的生物特性,但结果并不一致。本研究通过荟萃分析研究了农药施用对土壤生物学特性的总体影响。我们的研究结果表明,单独施用农药显著降低了土壤酶活性(脲酶- 2.5%,β-葡萄糖苷酶- 22%,脱氢酶- 10%)和微生物种群规模(微生物生物量- 6%,放线菌种群- 10%,细菌种群- 7%,真菌种群- 12%)。值得注意的是,与单一除草剂和杀虫剂相比,单独施用杀菌剂对土壤细菌、真菌和放线菌种群的影响不显著。与单一施用有机酸相比,施用有机酸农药显著提高了土壤呼吸(+ 60%)、脱氢酶(+ 73%)、脲酶(+ 80%)和β-葡萄糖苷酶(+ 65%)活性、微生物生物量(+ 79%)、细菌(+ 65%)和真菌(+ 13%)种群规模。施用有机酸农药后,土壤酸性磷酸酶活性显著降低(- 17%)。我们的研究结果表明,OAs与农药联合使用可以改变土壤的理化性质,从而恢复土壤的生物特性,但具体的OAs与单个农药类别联合使用的改善程度尚不清楚,需要在未来的研究中进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance. Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of: • Comparative toxicity • Mode of action • Pathophysiology • Plant growth regulators • Resistance • Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信