Bagging-based heteroscedasticity-adjusted ridge estimators in the linear regression model

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Maha Shabbir , Sohail Chand , Irum Sajjad Dar
{"title":"Bagging-based heteroscedasticity-adjusted ridge estimators in the linear regression model","authors":"Maha Shabbir ,&nbsp;Sohail Chand ,&nbsp;Irum Sajjad Dar","doi":"10.1016/j.kjs.2025.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The existence of multicollinearity between independent variables and heteroscedastic error has a colossal impact on the performance of the ordinary least square (OLS) estimator and its covariance matrix. In this study, new bootstrap aggregation (i.e. bagging) based ridge estimators are introduced to circumvent multicollinearity by controlling the influence of heteroscedastic error terms. These estimators are a novel combination of bagging and heteroscedastic-adjusted ridge (HAR) estimators. The performance of bagging-based HAR estimators is evaluated using intensive Monte Carlo simulations by considering multicollinearity with low, high, and severe degrees of heteroscedasticity. The findings reveal that at severe heteroscedasticity, the performance of the proposed HAR-HK∗, HAR-LW∗, HAR-HSL∗, and HAR-KMS∗ estimators is 26.3 %, 81.5 %, 90.1 %, and 30.5 % better than their HAR-HK, HAR-LW, HAR-HSL, and HAR-KMS counterparts when the collinearity level is 0.80, sample size is 25, and the number of independent variables is 5. Similar improvements are observed when heteroscedasticity levels are low and moderate, with different specifications for sample size, collinearity level, and number of independent variables. Overall, the bagging-based HAR estimators are efficient and perform better than the baseline HAR estimators. The real-life applications are illustrated using livestock and passenger car mileage data. The outcomes show that the suggested HAR-LW∗ (PRESS = 10.5028) and HAR-KMS∗(PRESS = 0.0497) perform best on the passenger car and livestock data respectively. The improvements will be helpful in efficiently handling the estimation problem when the two challenging issues are present in the data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17848,"journal":{"name":"Kuwait Journal of Science","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kuwait Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410825000562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of multicollinearity between independent variables and heteroscedastic error has a colossal impact on the performance of the ordinary least square (OLS) estimator and its covariance matrix. In this study, new bootstrap aggregation (i.e. bagging) based ridge estimators are introduced to circumvent multicollinearity by controlling the influence of heteroscedastic error terms. These estimators are a novel combination of bagging and heteroscedastic-adjusted ridge (HAR) estimators. The performance of bagging-based HAR estimators is evaluated using intensive Monte Carlo simulations by considering multicollinearity with low, high, and severe degrees of heteroscedasticity. The findings reveal that at severe heteroscedasticity, the performance of the proposed HAR-HK∗, HAR-LW∗, HAR-HSL∗, and HAR-KMS∗ estimators is 26.3 %, 81.5 %, 90.1 %, and 30.5 % better than their HAR-HK, HAR-LW, HAR-HSL, and HAR-KMS counterparts when the collinearity level is 0.80, sample size is 25, and the number of independent variables is 5. Similar improvements are observed when heteroscedasticity levels are low and moderate, with different specifications for sample size, collinearity level, and number of independent variables. Overall, the bagging-based HAR estimators are efficient and perform better than the baseline HAR estimators. The real-life applications are illustrated using livestock and passenger car mileage data. The outcomes show that the suggested HAR-LW∗ (PRESS = 10.5028) and HAR-KMS∗(PRESS = 0.0497) perform best on the passenger car and livestock data respectively. The improvements will be helpful in efficiently handling the estimation problem when the two challenging issues are present in the data.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kuwait Journal of Science
Kuwait Journal of Science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Kuwait Journal of Science (KJS) is indexed and abstracted by major publishing houses such as Chemical Abstract, Science Citation Index, Current contents, Mathematics Abstract, Micribiological Abstracts etc. KJS publishes peer-review articles in various fields of Science including Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics, Statistics, Biology, Chemistry and Earth & Environmental Sciences. In addition, it also aims to bring the results of scientific research carried out under a variety of intellectual traditions and organizations to the attention of specialized scholarly readership. As such, the publisher expects the submission of original manuscripts which contain analysis and solutions about important theoretical, empirical and normative issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信