Study and considerations on the determination of attenuation curves in concrete for radiotherapy beams

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
J.O. Páez, W. Rodriguez, D. Cano
{"title":"Study and considerations on the determination of attenuation curves in concrete for radiotherapy beams","authors":"J.O. Páez,&nbsp;W. Rodriguez,&nbsp;D. Cano","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the reliance on outdated Tenth Value Layer (TVL) data for radiotherapy beams in concrete, which results in inconsistencies in reported values. Attenuation curves were determined for various radiotherapy accelerator spectra below 10 MV in concrete. The aim is to provide more accurate data with approximately 1% statistical uncertainty, thereby correcting the reliance on outdated TVL data and establishing a more accurate framework for future research.</div><div>Numerical simulations were carried out using Geant4, which also allowed for the evaluation of statistical uncertainties. A divergent isotropic point source beam of X-rays, matching radiotherapy accelerator spectra, was directed toward concrete barriers of varying thicknesses. An ICRU-tissue equivalent detector, simulating the thorax of the MIRD Phantom, was positioned to measure the transmitted dose. The findings indicate that some results aligned with current TVL values, thereby validating the methodology. Nevertheless, many new data points revealed significant differences in shielding thickness requirements based on accelerator spectra and concrete density, along with minor differences attributable to concrete compositions. Discrepancies in shielding thickness from established standards like IAEA SRS47 and NCRP 151 were unraveled by introducing new data alongside the parameters used to determine them.</div><div>This research highlights the need for refined data in radiotherapy accelerator shielding calculations. By presenting new insights, it advocates for improving current practices and emphasizes the importance of reporting accelerator spectra and associated uncertainties. This study contributes by helping users understand which variables are relevant for reporting new data and which are less critical.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25001999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the reliance on outdated Tenth Value Layer (TVL) data for radiotherapy beams in concrete, which results in inconsistencies in reported values. Attenuation curves were determined for various radiotherapy accelerator spectra below 10 MV in concrete. The aim is to provide more accurate data with approximately 1% statistical uncertainty, thereby correcting the reliance on outdated TVL data and establishing a more accurate framework for future research.
Numerical simulations were carried out using Geant4, which also allowed for the evaluation of statistical uncertainties. A divergent isotropic point source beam of X-rays, matching radiotherapy accelerator spectra, was directed toward concrete barriers of varying thicknesses. An ICRU-tissue equivalent detector, simulating the thorax of the MIRD Phantom, was positioned to measure the transmitted dose. The findings indicate that some results aligned with current TVL values, thereby validating the methodology. Nevertheless, many new data points revealed significant differences in shielding thickness requirements based on accelerator spectra and concrete density, along with minor differences attributable to concrete compositions. Discrepancies in shielding thickness from established standards like IAEA SRS47 and NCRP 151 were unraveled by introducing new data alongside the parameters used to determine them.
This research highlights the need for refined data in radiotherapy accelerator shielding calculations. By presenting new insights, it advocates for improving current practices and emphasizes the importance of reporting accelerator spectra and associated uncertainties. This study contributes by helping users understand which variables are relevant for reporting new data and which are less critical.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信