Yuliang Zhu , Yucan Liu , Ke Yu , Jinlin Guo , Xianguo Ji , Xinyi Xu , Yan Zhang , Yuxia Wang , Jinming Duan , Hongwei Sun
{"title":"Degradation efficiencies of selected organic pesticides in aqueous solution using various advanced oxidation techniques","authors":"Yuliang Zhu , Yucan Liu , Ke Yu , Jinlin Guo , Xianguo Ji , Xinyi Xu , Yan Zhang , Yuxia Wang , Jinming Duan , Hongwei Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pervasive contamination of water resources by persistent organic pesticides necessitates the development of efficient water purification technologies. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five different oxidation techniques (KMnO<sub>4</sub>, NaClO, K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> (PS), Fenton, and UV/PS processes) for the simultaneous removal of six typical organic pesticides (cyromazine, dinotefuran, chloridazon, atrazine, diuron, and tebuconazole) from aqueous solutions. Experimental trials were systematically conducted across a range of oxidant concentrations and solution pH conditions, with degradation kinetics analyzed using pseudo-first-order kinetic models. Molecular reactivity was further probed using density functional theory (DFT) to identify key degradation sites. Results demonstrated that conventional oxidants (KMnO<sub>4</sub>, NaClO, K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub>) exhibited limited removal efficiency for organic pesticides ( removal rate < 50 %), which is attributed to the structural recalcitrance and reactive oxygen species (ROS) competition of the selected pesticides in mixed pesticide aqueous solution. The Fenton process achieved moderate removal (60 %–85 %) under acidic conditions (pH=3) but required strict H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/Fe<sup>2+</sup> stoichiometry (mass ratio 2:1) and generated operational challenges from sludge formation. In contrast, the UV/PS process demonstrated exceptional removal efficiencies (> 95 %) for selected organic pesticides at neutral pH, even with a minimal K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> dosage of 2.0 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>, supported by rapid reaction kinetics. DFT calculations revealed chlorine atoms as nucleophilic hotspots for ROS attack, while pyridine rings impeded degradation via steric hindrance. These findings highlight the UV/PS process as a scalable and pH–neutral technology for the effective removal of multiple pesticides, providing valuable insights for optimizing water treatment protocols in complex matrices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107048"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025003155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pervasive contamination of water resources by persistent organic pesticides necessitates the development of efficient water purification technologies. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five different oxidation techniques (KMnO4, NaClO, K2S2O8 (PS), Fenton, and UV/PS processes) for the simultaneous removal of six typical organic pesticides (cyromazine, dinotefuran, chloridazon, atrazine, diuron, and tebuconazole) from aqueous solutions. Experimental trials were systematically conducted across a range of oxidant concentrations and solution pH conditions, with degradation kinetics analyzed using pseudo-first-order kinetic models. Molecular reactivity was further probed using density functional theory (DFT) to identify key degradation sites. Results demonstrated that conventional oxidants (KMnO4, NaClO, K2S2O8) exhibited limited removal efficiency for organic pesticides ( removal rate < 50 %), which is attributed to the structural recalcitrance and reactive oxygen species (ROS) competition of the selected pesticides in mixed pesticide aqueous solution. The Fenton process achieved moderate removal (60 %–85 %) under acidic conditions (pH=3) but required strict H2O2/Fe2+ stoichiometry (mass ratio 2:1) and generated operational challenges from sludge formation. In contrast, the UV/PS process demonstrated exceptional removal efficiencies (> 95 %) for selected organic pesticides at neutral pH, even with a minimal K2S2O8 dosage of 2.0 mg·L−1, supported by rapid reaction kinetics. DFT calculations revealed chlorine atoms as nucleophilic hotspots for ROS attack, while pyridine rings impeded degradation via steric hindrance. These findings highlight the UV/PS process as a scalable and pH–neutral technology for the effective removal of multiple pesticides, providing valuable insights for optimizing water treatment protocols in complex matrices.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.