Hemant Nemade , Abhinav Thaduri , Jonathan T Gondi , Sravan Kumar Chava , Anil Kumar , Sahithi Shilpa Arya , L.M.Chandra Sekara Rao S
{"title":"Oncological outcomes of pathological extranodal extension (pENE) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): A proposal to refine the current staging","authors":"Hemant Nemade , Abhinav Thaduri , Jonathan T Gondi , Sravan Kumar Chava , Anil Kumar , Sahithi Shilpa Arya , L.M.Chandra Sekara Rao S","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Extranodal extension (ENE) is an important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), often associated with poor survival outcomes. However, the current nodal (N) staging system may need to be revised to reflect the prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that the number of positive lymph nodes may offer improved prognostic accuracy. This study evaluates the outcomes of OSCC patients with pathological ENE (pENE) and explores the prognostic significance of absolute positive lymph node count.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 640 OSCC patients with pENE who underwent curative-intent surgery and standard adjuvant therapies between May 2015 and December 2021. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify a cutoff for the number of positive lymph nodes predicting overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of OS and disease-free survival (DFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the entire cohort, the median DFS was 16 months (95 % CI: 12–19), and the mean OS was 57 months (95 % CI: 52–62). ROC analysis identified four positive lymph nodes as the optimal cutoff for predicting OS (AUC = 0.562, p = 0.01), with a sensitivity of 46.3 % and specificity of 65.2 %. Patients with > 4 positive lymph nodes had significantly poorer outcomes compared to those with ≤ 4 nodes: median DFS was 9 months vs. 21 months (p < 0.001), and mean OS was 26 months vs. 61 months (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed the number of positive lymph nodes as an independent predictor for OS (HR = 0.6, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.5, p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with pENE and > four positive lymph nodes have significantly worse survival outcomes despite standard adjuvant therapies. This highlights the need for improved risk stratification in the current nodal staging system. These findings suggest incorporating lymph node burden into staging frameworks could improve prognostic accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 107281"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837525001101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Extranodal extension (ENE) is an important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), often associated with poor survival outcomes. However, the current nodal (N) staging system may need to be revised to reflect the prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that the number of positive lymph nodes may offer improved prognostic accuracy. This study evaluates the outcomes of OSCC patients with pathological ENE (pENE) and explores the prognostic significance of absolute positive lymph node count.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective cohort study analyzed 640 OSCC patients with pENE who underwent curative-intent surgery and standard adjuvant therapies between May 2015 and December 2021. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify a cutoff for the number of positive lymph nodes predicting overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of OS and disease-free survival (DFS).
Results
In the entire cohort, the median DFS was 16 months (95 % CI: 12–19), and the mean OS was 57 months (95 % CI: 52–62). ROC analysis identified four positive lymph nodes as the optimal cutoff for predicting OS (AUC = 0.562, p = 0.01), with a sensitivity of 46.3 % and specificity of 65.2 %. Patients with > 4 positive lymph nodes had significantly poorer outcomes compared to those with ≤ 4 nodes: median DFS was 9 months vs. 21 months (p < 0.001), and mean OS was 26 months vs. 61 months (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed the number of positive lymph nodes as an independent predictor for OS (HR = 0.6, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.5, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Patients with pENE and > four positive lymph nodes have significantly worse survival outcomes despite standard adjuvant therapies. This highlights the need for improved risk stratification in the current nodal staging system. These findings suggest incorporating lymph node burden into staging frameworks could improve prognostic accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.