{"title":"Multi-step optimization design of pressure regulator for lateral inlet based on stepwise design of spring and structural","authors":"Xiaoran Wang , Chen Zhang , Guangyong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Installing a pressure regulator for laterals (PRL) at the non-pressure compensated drip tape inlet offers a cost-effective, uniform pressure control solution for irrigation, especially in developing countries. PRL regulate both flow and pressure, requiring high performance. However, traditional optimization methods face challenges like extensive experimentation and the risk of compromising certain metrics while optimizing others. This study proposes a multi-step optimization method combining Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and response surface experiments. Results show that with optimal spring parameters, PRLs achieve a pressure deviation (<em>α</em>) of under 5 %, an outlet pressure deviation from inlet pressure (<em>C</em><sub>V</sub>) under 10 %, and a pressure difference (Δ<em>P</em>) of less than 0.02 MPa across a 300–1000 L/h flow range. Unstable pressure at low flow is caused by a gap between the regulating cup and housing. Optimizing the outlet angle reduces pressure deviation from flow variations. Key factors influencing preset pressure (<em>P</em><sub>set</sub>) are spring stiffness (<em>K</em>) and pre-compression length (Δ<em>L</em>), followed by the bottom surface radius (<em>R</em><sub>bottom</sub>) and cup thickness (<em>R</em><sub>up</sub>). For <em>C</em><sub>V</sub>, <em>R</em><sub>bottom</sub> and <em>R</em><sub>up</sub> are most significant, with minimal impact from parameter interactions. For Δ<em>P</em>, <em>R</em><sub>bottom</sub>, <em>K</em>, Δ<em>L</em>, and <em>R</em><sub>up</sub>, with significant interactions, are key factors. Based on comprehensive evaluations, three PRL variants with preset pressures of 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 MPa were developed, offering improved performance: Δ<em>H</em> under 0.05 MPa, ΔP under 0.012 MPa, <em>C</em><sub>V</sub> under 5 %, and <em>α</em> under 1.5 %. These optimized PRLs significantly outperform the original design and offer a broader range of products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 110333"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925004399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Installing a pressure regulator for laterals (PRL) at the non-pressure compensated drip tape inlet offers a cost-effective, uniform pressure control solution for irrigation, especially in developing countries. PRL regulate both flow and pressure, requiring high performance. However, traditional optimization methods face challenges like extensive experimentation and the risk of compromising certain metrics while optimizing others. This study proposes a multi-step optimization method combining Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and response surface experiments. Results show that with optimal spring parameters, PRLs achieve a pressure deviation (α) of under 5 %, an outlet pressure deviation from inlet pressure (CV) under 10 %, and a pressure difference (ΔP) of less than 0.02 MPa across a 300–1000 L/h flow range. Unstable pressure at low flow is caused by a gap between the regulating cup and housing. Optimizing the outlet angle reduces pressure deviation from flow variations. Key factors influencing preset pressure (Pset) are spring stiffness (K) and pre-compression length (ΔL), followed by the bottom surface radius (Rbottom) and cup thickness (Rup). For CV, Rbottom and Rup are most significant, with minimal impact from parameter interactions. For ΔP, Rbottom, K, ΔL, and Rup, with significant interactions, are key factors. Based on comprehensive evaluations, three PRL variants with preset pressures of 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 MPa were developed, offering improved performance: ΔH under 0.05 MPa, ΔP under 0.012 MPa, CV under 5 %, and α under 1.5 %. These optimized PRLs significantly outperform the original design and offer a broader range of products.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.