Minhee Kang , Kristen M. Marks , Andrea L. Cox , Kenneth E. Sherman
{"title":"An efficient vaccine clinical trial: ACTG A5379 hepatitis B vaccine trial in persons with HIV","authors":"Minhee Kang , Kristen M. Marks , Andrea L. Cox , Kenneth E. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinical trial designs that address multiple questions more efficiently are desirable. When we designed a hepatitis B vaccine trial to assess seroprotective outcomes in persons with HIV (PWH), we aimed for an efficient design that addressed three primary objectives in two study populations. The study focused on: PWH who did not respond to prior HBV vaccination, and PWH with no known history of HBV vaccination. Whereas one vaccine regimen was studied in the vaccine-naïve participants, multiple interventions were considered for those with prior nonresponse, with two different vaccines and two dosing schedules. Several features of the trial design required statistical considerations related to multiple testing: (1) assessment of vaccine response in two study populations under one trial, (2) comparisons among multiple treatment arms, and (3) sequential repeated significance tests in interim data monitoring. We describe the features aimed to gain statistical and administrative efficiencies, including reduction in the study sample size of 12 %. We also describe how we controlled type I error and planned interim data monitoring, and highlight the time lag issue due to the laboratory-based immunogenicity endpoint in this international, multi-center trial (<span><span>NCT04193189</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 127028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25003251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical trial designs that address multiple questions more efficiently are desirable. When we designed a hepatitis B vaccine trial to assess seroprotective outcomes in persons with HIV (PWH), we aimed for an efficient design that addressed three primary objectives in two study populations. The study focused on: PWH who did not respond to prior HBV vaccination, and PWH with no known history of HBV vaccination. Whereas one vaccine regimen was studied in the vaccine-naïve participants, multiple interventions were considered for those with prior nonresponse, with two different vaccines and two dosing schedules. Several features of the trial design required statistical considerations related to multiple testing: (1) assessment of vaccine response in two study populations under one trial, (2) comparisons among multiple treatment arms, and (3) sequential repeated significance tests in interim data monitoring. We describe the features aimed to gain statistical and administrative efficiencies, including reduction in the study sample size of 12 %. We also describe how we controlled type I error and planned interim data monitoring, and highlight the time lag issue due to the laboratory-based immunogenicity endpoint in this international, multi-center trial (NCT04193189).
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.