Jingyang Wang , Xiang Li , Ruiyan Wu , Xiangpeng Mu , Baiyinbaoligao , Jiahua Wei , Jie Gao , Dongqin Yin , Xin Tao , Keyan Xu
{"title":"A runoff prediction approach based on machine learning, ensemble forecasting and error correction: A case study of source area of Yellow River","authors":"Jingyang Wang , Xiang Li , Ruiyan Wu , Xiangpeng Mu , Baiyinbaoligao , Jiahua Wei , Jie Gao , Dongqin Yin , Xin Tao , Keyan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately predicting river runoff holds substantial significance to meet several objectives, including basin water resource allocation, flood control, and drought relief. In this study, we introduced a novel multistep runoff prediction model featuring machine learning, ensemble forecasting, and error correction (EC). Five machine learning models served as base learners, providing multistep forecasting results. We introduced an ensemble forecasting strategy (EFS) to effectively combine the forecast results of the base learners. The EFS included scenario segmentation, which divided the runoff time series into flood and nonflood seasons and leveraged the strengths of different predictors to optimize weights individually, and weight combination optimization, which utilized nine optimization methods to fine-tune the weight combinations. Additionally, to further reduce predictable components in the error series, we constructed an EC model to limit forecasting errors. We conducted a series of experiments on the three hydrological stations (Jimai, Maqu, and Tangnaihai) in the source area of the Yellow River to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed runoff prediction approach. The 7-day experimental results demonstrated the following: (1) the EFS integrated base learners to achieve improved performance at each step compared with single models; (2) mean absolute error was notably produced following the EC, with a higher degree of improvement for longer lead days; and (3) the proposed model outperformed other existing models across all experimental stations and lead times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"658 ","pages":"Article 133190"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425005281","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurately predicting river runoff holds substantial significance to meet several objectives, including basin water resource allocation, flood control, and drought relief. In this study, we introduced a novel multistep runoff prediction model featuring machine learning, ensemble forecasting, and error correction (EC). Five machine learning models served as base learners, providing multistep forecasting results. We introduced an ensemble forecasting strategy (EFS) to effectively combine the forecast results of the base learners. The EFS included scenario segmentation, which divided the runoff time series into flood and nonflood seasons and leveraged the strengths of different predictors to optimize weights individually, and weight combination optimization, which utilized nine optimization methods to fine-tune the weight combinations. Additionally, to further reduce predictable components in the error series, we constructed an EC model to limit forecasting errors. We conducted a series of experiments on the three hydrological stations (Jimai, Maqu, and Tangnaihai) in the source area of the Yellow River to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed runoff prediction approach. The 7-day experimental results demonstrated the following: (1) the EFS integrated base learners to achieve improved performance at each step compared with single models; (2) mean absolute error was notably produced following the EC, with a higher degree of improvement for longer lead days; and (3) the proposed model outperformed other existing models across all experimental stations and lead times.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.