Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief

IF 9.1 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Will M. Gervais, Ryan T. McKay, Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi, Robert M. Ross, Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan Jong, Jonathan A. Lanman
{"title":"Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief","authors":"Will M. Gervais, Ryan T. McKay, Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi, Robert M. Ross, Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan Jong, Jonathan A. Lanman","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2404720122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We find evidence of <jats:italic>belief in belief</jats:italic> —intuitive preferences for religious belief over atheism, even among atheist participants—across eight comparatively secular countries. Religion is a cross-cultural human universal, yet explicit markers of religiosity have rapidly waned in large parts of the world in recent decades. We explored whether intuitive religious influence lingers, even among nonbelievers in largely secular societies. We adapted a classic experimental philosophy task to test for this intuitive belief in belief among people in eight comparatively nonreligious countries: Canada, China, Czechia, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam (total <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 3,804). Our analyses revealed strong evidence that 1) people intuitively favor religious belief over atheism and that 2) this pattern was not moderated by participants’ own self-reported atheism. Indeed, 3) even atheists in relatively secular societies intuitively prefer belief to atheism. These inferences were robust across different analytic strategies and across other measures of individual differences in religiosity and religious instruction. Although explicit religious belief has rapidly declined in these countries, it is possible that belief in belief may still persist. These results speak to the complex psychological and cultural dynamics of secularization.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2404720122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We find evidence of belief in belief —intuitive preferences for religious belief over atheism, even among atheist participants—across eight comparatively secular countries. Religion is a cross-cultural human universal, yet explicit markers of religiosity have rapidly waned in large parts of the world in recent decades. We explored whether intuitive religious influence lingers, even among nonbelievers in largely secular societies. We adapted a classic experimental philosophy task to test for this intuitive belief in belief among people in eight comparatively nonreligious countries: Canada, China, Czechia, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam (total N = 3,804). Our analyses revealed strong evidence that 1) people intuitively favor religious belief over atheism and that 2) this pattern was not moderated by participants’ own self-reported atheism. Indeed, 3) even atheists in relatively secular societies intuitively prefer belief to atheism. These inferences were robust across different analytic strategies and across other measures of individual differences in religiosity and religious instruction. Although explicit religious belief has rapidly declined in these countries, it is possible that belief in belief may still persist. These results speak to the complex psychological and cultural dynamics of secularization.
对信仰的信仰:即使是世俗国家的无神论者也表现出对宗教信仰的直觉偏好
我们在八个相对世俗的国家中发现了信仰中的信仰的证据——对宗教信仰的直觉偏好超过了对无神论的偏好,即使在无神论者参与者中也是如此。宗教是一种跨文化的人类共性,然而近几十年来,宗教虔诚的明确标志在世界大部分地区迅速减弱。我们探讨了直觉上的宗教影响是否会持续存在,即使在大部分世俗社会的非信徒中也是如此。我们采用了一个经典的哲学实验任务,在加拿大、中国、捷克、日本、荷兰、瑞典、英国和越南这八个相对无宗教信仰的国家(总N = 3,804)中测试人们对信仰的直觉信仰。我们的分析揭示了强有力的证据:1)人们本能地倾向于宗教信仰,而不是无神论;2)这种模式不受参与者自我报告的无神论的影响。的确,即使是相对世俗社会中的无神论者,也会本能地倾向于信仰而非无神论。这些推论在不同的分析策略和宗教虔诚度和宗教指导的个体差异的其他测量中都是稳健的。尽管明确的宗教信仰在这些国家迅速下降,但对信仰的信仰可能仍然存在。这些结果说明了世俗化的复杂心理和文化动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信