Approaches to children’s smartphone and social media use must go beyond bans

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-082569
Victoria A Goodyear, Carrie James, Amy Orben, Mikael Quennerstedt, Gilson Schwartz, Miranda Pallan
{"title":"Approaches to children’s smartphone and social media use must go beyond bans","authors":"Victoria A Goodyear, Carrie James, Amy Orben, Mikael Quennerstedt, Gilson Schwartz, Miranda Pallan","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-082569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supporting the healthy development of children requires an approach to smartphone and social media use underpinned by age appropriate design and education, argue Victoria Goodyear and colleagues Children commonly use their smartphones to access social media, play games, and interact with others, accounting for the majority of overall screen use, particularly in the 8-17 age group.1 Most recently, banning or restricting children’s (under age 182) access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools, and parents. Several countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, as well as regions of the US and Canada, have introduced laws, policies, or guidance for schools to ban or heavily restrict the use of phones in schools.3 In Australia, new legislation prohibits social media use for children under age 16. In the US, the surgeon general called for warning labels on social media apps.4 Such restrictions lie within broader narratives that smartphones and social media are not safe environments for children. Moreover, bans are responses to increased public pressure to mitigate the potential harmful effects of smartphones and social media on health, wellbeing, and other associated outcomes—for example, academic performance, disruptive behaviours, and bullying.5 There are, however, no simple, one-size-fits-all answers. Although many policy makers, schools, and parents are primed to believe arguments that smartphones and social media are inherently harmful, the evidence about their overall effect on children is not clear cut.67 Smartphone bans have the advantage of being immediately actionable and relatively straightforward to enforce. However, despite positive anecdotal data, we do not have the evidence to establish the types of bans that are effective and what works best for children of different ages.89 A recent evaluation of school smartphone policies in England reported that restricted smartphone use in schools …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supporting the healthy development of children requires an approach to smartphone and social media use underpinned by age appropriate design and education, argue Victoria Goodyear and colleagues Children commonly use their smartphones to access social media, play games, and interact with others, accounting for the majority of overall screen use, particularly in the 8-17 age group.1 Most recently, banning or restricting children’s (under age 182) access to smartphones and social media has grasped the attention of policy makers, schools, and parents. Several countries, including France, Turkey, Norway, Sweden, as well as regions of the US and Canada, have introduced laws, policies, or guidance for schools to ban or heavily restrict the use of phones in schools.3 In Australia, new legislation prohibits social media use for children under age 16. In the US, the surgeon general called for warning labels on social media apps.4 Such restrictions lie within broader narratives that smartphones and social media are not safe environments for children. Moreover, bans are responses to increased public pressure to mitigate the potential harmful effects of smartphones and social media on health, wellbeing, and other associated outcomes—for example, academic performance, disruptive behaviours, and bullying.5 There are, however, no simple, one-size-fits-all answers. Although many policy makers, schools, and parents are primed to believe arguments that smartphones and social media are inherently harmful, the evidence about their overall effect on children is not clear cut.67 Smartphone bans have the advantage of being immediately actionable and relatively straightforward to enforce. However, despite positive anecdotal data, we do not have the evidence to establish the types of bans that are effective and what works best for children of different ages.89 A recent evaluation of school smartphone policies in England reported that restricted smartphone use in schools …
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信