Effect of a multifaceted intervention on potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in general practice, out-of-hours services, and nursing homes in Spain.
Ana García-Sangenís, Fabiana Raynal-Floriano, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Laura Vallejo-Torres, Carl Llor
{"title":"Effect of a multifaceted intervention on potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in general practice, out-of-hours services, and nursing homes in Spain.","authors":"Ana García-Sangenís, Fabiana Raynal-Floriano, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Laura Vallejo-Torres, Carl Llor","doi":"10.37201/req/024.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention on potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescribing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Before and after quality control study carried out in three different settingsgeneral practice, out-of-hours services, and nursing homesin Spain. Healthcare professionals (both doctors and nurses) self-registered common infections using a specific template for each setting before (2022) and after (2023) receiving a 5-hour intervention on prudent antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine professionals participated in the first registration (48 in general practice, 23 in out-of-hours services, and 15 in nursing homes), with 71 (79.8%) completing the intervention and second registration. Potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions were 68.5%, 41.7%, and 77.7% in the first registration, respectively, and 61.4%, 34.8%, and 86.8% after the intervention, showing reductions of 10.4% in general practice and 16.5% in out-of-hours services, and an 11.7% increase in nursing homes, albeit without statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that this intervention slightly improved antibiotic use, with minimal impact, but worsened in nursing homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/024.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention on potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescribing.
Material and methods: Before and after quality control study carried out in three different settingsgeneral practice, out-of-hours services, and nursing homesin Spain. Healthcare professionals (both doctors and nurses) self-registered common infections using a specific template for each setting before (2022) and after (2023) receiving a 5-hour intervention on prudent antibiotic use.
Results: Eighty-nine professionals participated in the first registration (48 in general practice, 23 in out-of-hours services, and 15 in nursing homes), with 71 (79.8%) completing the intervention and second registration. Potentially unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions were 68.5%, 41.7%, and 77.7% in the first registration, respectively, and 61.4%, 34.8%, and 86.8% after the intervention, showing reductions of 10.4% in general practice and 16.5% in out-of-hours services, and an 11.7% increase in nursing homes, albeit without statistically significant differences.
Conclusions: The study found that this intervention slightly improved antibiotic use, with minimal impact, but worsened in nursing homes.