Early Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplant Does Not Offer Any Mortality Benefits: A Study of Trends in Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplantation Over the Last Two Decades.

Abhishek Kumar, Levi Bonnell, Sarat Kuppachi
{"title":"Early Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplant Does Not Offer Any Mortality Benefits: A Study of Trends in Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplantation Over the Last Two Decades.","authors":"Abhishek Kumar, Levi Bonnell, Sarat Kuppachi","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-emptive kidney transplantation is considered the optimal treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of the study is to evaluate current state of pre-emptive kidney transplants in the United States with focus on mortality benefit with early pre-emptive transplants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we explored trends in pre-emptive kidney transplantation in first time adult recipients. We created four groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 10 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 10 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 15 to < 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) based on the eGFR at the time of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the difference in mortality and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method was used to compare risk of ESKD among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-emptive kidney transplant remain at roughly 18% of total kidney transplant (33% were from deceased donors and 67% from living donors). White patients with a higher level of education and with private insurance were most likely to receive pre-emptive kidney transplant. No difference in mortality was found in the four eGFR groups. In a subgroup analysis looking only at recipients of pre-emptive kidney transplant from living donors, no mortality difference was again noted among the four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-emptive kidney transplants continue to favor a select population and remain at low numbers (9% of total deceased donor kidney transplants and 33% of living donor kidney transplants [LDKTs]). Early pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant did not confer a mortality benefit compared to transplantation when eGFR was < 15 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-emptive kidney transplantation is considered the optimal treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The aim of the study is to evaluate current state of pre-emptive kidney transplants in the United States with focus on mortality benefit with early pre-emptive transplants.

Methods: Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we explored trends in pre-emptive kidney transplantation in first time adult recipients. We created four groups (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 10 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15 to < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ≥ 20 mL/min/1.73 m2) based on the eGFR at the time of transplant. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the difference in mortality and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method was used to compare risk of ESKD among the groups.

Results: Pre-emptive kidney transplant remain at roughly 18% of total kidney transplant (33% were from deceased donors and 67% from living donors). White patients with a higher level of education and with private insurance were most likely to receive pre-emptive kidney transplant. No difference in mortality was found in the four eGFR groups. In a subgroup analysis looking only at recipients of pre-emptive kidney transplant from living donors, no mortality difference was again noted among the four groups.

Conclusions: Pre-emptive kidney transplants continue to favor a select population and remain at low numbers (9% of total deceased donor kidney transplants and 33% of living donor kidney transplants [LDKTs]). Early pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant did not confer a mortality benefit compared to transplantation when eGFR was < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信