The Comparative Effects of Cryotherapy and Music Therapy on Pain and Anxiety in Vascular Access Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Tria.

Current health sciences journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.50.04.03
Hadi Jafarimanesh, Sara Samiei, Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam, Mehdi Zareie, Amos Nawunimali Suuk
{"title":"The Comparative Effects of Cryotherapy and Music Therapy on Pain and Anxiety in Vascular Access Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Tria.","authors":"Hadi Jafarimanesh, Sara Samiei, Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam, Mehdi Zareie, Amos Nawunimali Suuk","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.50.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The fear of vascular access procedures reduces patient cooperation, often resulting in unsuccessful venipuncture attempts and prolonging the overall treatment process. Because people getting venipunctures in medical and surgical settings usually feel pain and anxiety, the goal of this study was to look at and compare how cryotherapy (CT) and music therapy (MT) affected the levels of pain and anxiety (P&Amp;A) these people felt.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This research utilized a randomized controlled trial methodology. The target population consisted of patients hospitalized in the medical-surgical wards of Valiasr Hospital, Arak, Iran. One hundred twenty patients were purposively selected and then randomly assigned (using block randomization) to one of four groups: MT, CT, combination therapy (COBT), or control. P&Amp;A levels were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Visual Anxiety Intensity Scale (VAIS). Data were analyzed utilizing version 21 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage, along with inferential statistics, such as the analysis of variance test, paired t-test, and Chi-square, were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The findings revealed a statistically significant disparity in pain levels among the four groups (P<0.001). The mean pain score in the COBT group (1.66±1.66) was lower than that of the MT group (2.03±1.84) and the CT group (2.43±2.16). However, the three intervention groups (MT, CT, and COBT) showed no notable difference from a statistical perspective (P>0.05). Additionally, a statistically substantial distinction in anxiety levels was observed among the four groups after the study (P<0.05). Both the COBT and MT therapies markedly diminished anxiety severity in comparison to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results demonstrated that MT, CT, and COBT are effective in alleviating P&Amp;A in patients having venipuncture procedures. These interventions may serve as valuable complementary or alternative approaches in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93963,"journal":{"name":"Current health sciences journal","volume":"50 4","pages":"488-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.50.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The fear of vascular access procedures reduces patient cooperation, often resulting in unsuccessful venipuncture attempts and prolonging the overall treatment process. Because people getting venipunctures in medical and surgical settings usually feel pain and anxiety, the goal of this study was to look at and compare how cryotherapy (CT) and music therapy (MT) affected the levels of pain and anxiety (P&Amp;A) these people felt.

Method: This research utilized a randomized controlled trial methodology. The target population consisted of patients hospitalized in the medical-surgical wards of Valiasr Hospital, Arak, Iran. One hundred twenty patients were purposively selected and then randomly assigned (using block randomization) to one of four groups: MT, CT, combination therapy (COBT), or control. P&Amp;A levels were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Visual Anxiety Intensity Scale (VAIS). Data were analyzed utilizing version 21 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage, along with inferential statistics, such as the analysis of variance test, paired t-test, and Chi-square, were employed for analysis.

Findings: The findings revealed a statistically significant disparity in pain levels among the four groups (P<0.001). The mean pain score in the COBT group (1.66±1.66) was lower than that of the MT group (2.03±1.84) and the CT group (2.43±2.16). However, the three intervention groups (MT, CT, and COBT) showed no notable difference from a statistical perspective (P>0.05). Additionally, a statistically substantial distinction in anxiety levels was observed among the four groups after the study (P<0.05). Both the COBT and MT therapies markedly diminished anxiety severity in comparison to the control group.

Conclusion: The study results demonstrated that MT, CT, and COBT are effective in alleviating P&Amp;A in patients having venipuncture procedures. These interventions may serve as valuable complementary or alternative approaches in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信