Nasma Torfah, Anthony Lau, Hans Haag, David Yeom, Vivien Cao, Trana Hussaini
{"title":"Evaluating Levetiracetam Weight-Based Dosing in Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus.","authors":"Nasma Torfah, Anthony Lau, Hans Haag, David Yeom, Vivien Cao, Trana Hussaini","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) used as a second line after benzodiazepines for status epilepticus treatment. Current literature lacks direct head-to-head comparisons between different LEV loading dose strategies, leading to uncertainty about superior dosing methods and thus clinical practice variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare efficacy and safety of low (<30 mg/kg) versus high (≥30 mg/kg) weight-based LEV loading doses in adults with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (BRSE). The primary outcome of this study was termination of BRSE. No requirement for additional ASM after LEV was a surrogate for BRSE termination. Secondary endpoints included endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day all-cause mortality and adverse drug reactions. Statistical analysis included discrete and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and win-ratio analysis, to control for potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 106 patients included in this study, 54 (51%) did not require additional ASM after LEV, thereby achieving seizure termination. There was a higher proportion of patients with seizure termination in the higher weight-based dosing group as compared to the lower weight-based group (66% vs 40%, respectively; aOR 3.07; 95% CI: 1.36-7.21). There were lower rates for endotracheal intubation, ICU admission and all-cause mortality in the higher dosing group. Adverse events were comparable between the both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LEV's high weight-based loading dose strategy (≥30 mg/kg) is more effective in the termination of BRSE as compared to the lower weight-based loading dose strategy (<30 mg/kg).</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.56","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) used as a second line after benzodiazepines for status epilepticus treatment. Current literature lacks direct head-to-head comparisons between different LEV loading dose strategies, leading to uncertainty about superior dosing methods and thus clinical practice variations.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare efficacy and safety of low (<30 mg/kg) versus high (≥30 mg/kg) weight-based LEV loading doses in adults with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (BRSE). The primary outcome of this study was termination of BRSE. No requirement for additional ASM after LEV was a surrogate for BRSE termination. Secondary endpoints included endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day all-cause mortality and adverse drug reactions. Statistical analysis included discrete and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and win-ratio analysis, to control for potential confounding variables.
Results: Of the 106 patients included in this study, 54 (51%) did not require additional ASM after LEV, thereby achieving seizure termination. There was a higher proportion of patients with seizure termination in the higher weight-based dosing group as compared to the lower weight-based group (66% vs 40%, respectively; aOR 3.07; 95% CI: 1.36-7.21). There were lower rates for endotracheal intubation, ICU admission and all-cause mortality in the higher dosing group. Adverse events were comparable between the both groups.
Conclusion: LEV's high weight-based loading dose strategy (≥30 mg/kg) is more effective in the termination of BRSE as compared to the lower weight-based loading dose strategy (<30 mg/kg).
期刊介绍:
Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.