Evaluating Levetiracetam Weight-Based Dosing in Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nasma Torfah, Anthony Lau, Hans Haag, David Yeom, Vivien Cao, Trana Hussaini
{"title":"Evaluating Levetiracetam Weight-Based Dosing in Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus.","authors":"Nasma Torfah, Anthony Lau, Hans Haag, David Yeom, Vivien Cao, Trana Hussaini","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) used as a second line after benzodiazepines for status epilepticus treatment. Current literature lacks direct head-to-head comparisons between different LEV loading dose strategies, leading to uncertainty about superior dosing methods and thus clinical practice variations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare efficacy and safety of low (<30 mg/kg) versus high (≥30 mg/kg) weight-based LEV loading doses in adults with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (BRSE). The primary outcome of this study was termination of BRSE. No requirement for additional ASM after LEV was a surrogate for BRSE termination. Secondary endpoints included endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day all-cause mortality and adverse drug reactions. Statistical analysis included discrete and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and win-ratio analysis, to control for potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 106 patients included in this study, 54 (51%) did not require additional ASM after LEV, thereby achieving seizure termination. There was a higher proportion of patients with seizure termination in the higher weight-based dosing group as compared to the lower weight-based group (66% vs 40%, respectively; aOR 3.07; 95% CI: 1.36-7.21). There were lower rates for endotracheal intubation, ICU admission and all-cause mortality in the higher dosing group. Adverse events were comparable between the both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LEV's high weight-based loading dose strategy (≥30 mg/kg) is more effective in the termination of BRSE as compared to the lower weight-based loading dose strategy (<30 mg/kg).</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.56","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) used as a second line after benzodiazepines for status epilepticus treatment. Current literature lacks direct head-to-head comparisons between different LEV loading dose strategies, leading to uncertainty about superior dosing methods and thus clinical practice variations.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare efficacy and safety of low (<30 mg/kg) versus high (≥30 mg/kg) weight-based LEV loading doses in adults with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (BRSE). The primary outcome of this study was termination of BRSE. No requirement for additional ASM after LEV was a surrogate for BRSE termination. Secondary endpoints included endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day all-cause mortality and adverse drug reactions. Statistical analysis included discrete and inferential statistics, including logistic regression and win-ratio analysis, to control for potential confounding variables.

Results: Of the 106 patients included in this study, 54 (51%) did not require additional ASM after LEV, thereby achieving seizure termination. There was a higher proportion of patients with seizure termination in the higher weight-based dosing group as compared to the lower weight-based group (66% vs 40%, respectively; aOR 3.07; 95% CI: 1.36-7.21). There were lower rates for endotracheal intubation, ICU admission and all-cause mortality in the higher dosing group. Adverse events were comparable between the both groups.

Conclusion: LEV's high weight-based loading dose strategy (≥30 mg/kg) is more effective in the termination of BRSE as compared to the lower weight-based loading dose strategy (<30 mg/kg).

苯二氮卓难治性癫痫持续状态中左乙拉西坦体重给药的评价。
背景:左乙拉西坦(LEV)是一种抗癫痫药物(ASM),在苯二氮卓类药物之后用作治疗癫痫持续状态的二线药物。目前的文献缺乏不同LEV负荷剂量策略之间的直接正面比较,导致了更好的给药方法的不确定性和临床实践的差异。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,比较低剂量LEV的疗效和安全性。结果:纳入研究的106例患者中,54例(51%)患者在LEV后不需要额外的ASM,从而实现癫痫发作终止。与低体重剂量组相比,高体重剂量组癫痫发作终止的患者比例更高(分别为66%和40%;优势比3.07;95% ci: 1.36-7.21)。高剂量组气管插管率、ICU住院率和全因死亡率均较低。两组之间的不良事件具有可比性。结论:LEV的高负荷剂量策略(≥30 mg/kg)在终止BRSE方面比低负荷剂量策略更有效(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信