Assessing Nasal Nitric Oxide in Allergic Rhinitis: A Controversial Biomarker.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Natalia Louca, Despina Damianou, Nektaria Kostea, Panayiotis Kouis, Panayiotis Yiallouros, Constantinos Pitsios
{"title":"Assessing Nasal Nitric Oxide in Allergic Rhinitis: A Controversial Biomarker.","authors":"Natalia Louca, Despina Damianou, Nektaria Kostea, Panayiotis Kouis, Panayiotis Yiallouros, Constantinos Pitsios","doi":"10.3390/medicina61030516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and objectives:</i> Increased levels of nitric oxide (NO) are produced in various inflammatory diseases like allergic asthma. Fractional exhaled NO has been studied as a biomarker of type 2 inflammation in asthma, while the use of nasal NO (nNO) as a diagnostic tool for allergic rhinitis (AR) is less established. In the present study, we investigated nNO as a potential biomarker for differentiating AR from nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). <i>Materials and methods:</i> Medical students were invited to complete a questionnaire on rhinitis symptoms. Individuals who reported nasal symptoms were invited to participate in the clinical phase of the study, which included considering the patient's medical history, clinical examination, skin-prick tests (SPTs) for the 14 most relevant allergens in the region, and nNO measurement using the NIOX VERO portable nitric oxide analyzer. Informed consent was obtained at each stage of recruitment and clinical assessment. <i>Results:</i> Overall, 62 out of 122 volunteers recruited reported rhinitis symptoms and were investigated further with nNO measurements and SPTs. In total, 39 had SPT-confirmed AR, while 23 were classified as NAR subjects. Both nNO measurements and SPTs were performed on the same day, during the pollen season. The comparison of mean nNO concentrations (830 ± 247 ppb and 851 ± 373 in AR and NAR groups, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference. <i>Conclusions:</i> we concluded that nNO is not a reliable independent biomarker in the diagnosis of AR.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Increased levels of nitric oxide (NO) are produced in various inflammatory diseases like allergic asthma. Fractional exhaled NO has been studied as a biomarker of type 2 inflammation in asthma, while the use of nasal NO (nNO) as a diagnostic tool for allergic rhinitis (AR) is less established. In the present study, we investigated nNO as a potential biomarker for differentiating AR from nonallergic rhinitis (NAR). Materials and methods: Medical students were invited to complete a questionnaire on rhinitis symptoms. Individuals who reported nasal symptoms were invited to participate in the clinical phase of the study, which included considering the patient's medical history, clinical examination, skin-prick tests (SPTs) for the 14 most relevant allergens in the region, and nNO measurement using the NIOX VERO portable nitric oxide analyzer. Informed consent was obtained at each stage of recruitment and clinical assessment. Results: Overall, 62 out of 122 volunteers recruited reported rhinitis symptoms and were investigated further with nNO measurements and SPTs. In total, 39 had SPT-confirmed AR, while 23 were classified as NAR subjects. Both nNO measurements and SPTs were performed on the same day, during the pollen season. The comparison of mean nNO concentrations (830 ± 247 ppb and 851 ± 373 in AR and NAR groups, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: we concluded that nNO is not a reliable independent biomarker in the diagnosis of AR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信