Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations Among Weight Stigma, Psychological Distress, and Eating Behaviors in Youth with Obesity: A Clinical Sample.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wee Shen Khoo, Ying-Chu Chen, Yen-Yin Chou, Yu-Wen Pan, Yun-Han Weng, Meng-Che Tsai
{"title":"Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations Among Weight Stigma, Psychological Distress, and Eating Behaviors in Youth with Obesity: A Clinical Sample.","authors":"Wee Shen Khoo, Ying-Chu Chen, Yen-Yin Chou, Yu-Wen Pan, Yun-Han Weng, Meng-Che Tsai","doi":"10.3390/medicina61030466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Obesity in youth is a growing public health concern, placing them at higher risk for adverse physical and psychological outcomes. Understanding the predictors that affect weight management, particularly the role of internalized weight stigma, psychosocial factors, and eating behaviors, is essential for developing an effective intervention at longitudinal follow-up. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We enrolled 102 youths with obesity aged 10 to 18 years old from clinical settings. Baseline demographic data, psychosocial measures, including the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and eating behavior scales, such as the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) and eating disorder as Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food questionnaire (SCOFF), were collected in the first visit. We conducted a study with both cross-sectional and longitudinal components. Correlational bivariate analysis was conducted to explore relationships between key variables. The factors affecting BMI changes were investigated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) as part of a longitudinal analysis. <i>Results</i>: The mean age of participants was 13.22 years and 63.7% were male. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed positive relationships between initial BMI Z-scores and WSSQ scores (r = 0.196, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In bivariate analysis, a negative correlation was found between the difference in BMI Z-scores and visit number (r = -0.428, <i>p</i> < 0.01). GEE analysis demonstrated that initial BMI Z-scores (coefficient = 1.342, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and anxiety (coefficient = 0.050, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of BMI Z-scores, while depression was negatively associated (coefficient = -0.081, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Excluding the TFEQ subscales, SCOFF improved the model's QIC and highlighted WSSQ as a significant, albeit weak, predictor (<i>p</i> = 0.615 in the full model versus <i>p</i> < 0.05 in the reduced model). <i>Conclusions</i>: Psychosocial factors, particularly anxiety and weight stigma, are associated with elevated BMI Z-scores in youth affected by obesity in this study. The baseline age, BMI Z-score, internalized weight stigma, and psychological stress influenced the body weight trajectory over time. Frequent clinical follow-ups contribute to improved BMI outcomes. Future research may examine the efficacy of weight management by reducing weight stigma and psychological distress along with the outpatient care of obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Obesity in youth is a growing public health concern, placing them at higher risk for adverse physical and psychological outcomes. Understanding the predictors that affect weight management, particularly the role of internalized weight stigma, psychosocial factors, and eating behaviors, is essential for developing an effective intervention at longitudinal follow-up. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 102 youths with obesity aged 10 to 18 years old from clinical settings. Baseline demographic data, psychosocial measures, including the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and eating behavior scales, such as the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) and eating disorder as Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food questionnaire (SCOFF), were collected in the first visit. We conducted a study with both cross-sectional and longitudinal components. Correlational bivariate analysis was conducted to explore relationships between key variables. The factors affecting BMI changes were investigated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) as part of a longitudinal analysis. Results: The mean age of participants was 13.22 years and 63.7% were male. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed positive relationships between initial BMI Z-scores and WSSQ scores (r = 0.196, p < 0.05). In bivariate analysis, a negative correlation was found between the difference in BMI Z-scores and visit number (r = -0.428, p < 0.01). GEE analysis demonstrated that initial BMI Z-scores (coefficient = 1.342, p < 0.001) and anxiety (coefficient = 0.050, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of BMI Z-scores, while depression was negatively associated (coefficient = -0.081, p < 0.001). Excluding the TFEQ subscales, SCOFF improved the model's QIC and highlighted WSSQ as a significant, albeit weak, predictor (p = 0.615 in the full model versus p < 0.05 in the reduced model). Conclusions: Psychosocial factors, particularly anxiety and weight stigma, are associated with elevated BMI Z-scores in youth affected by obesity in this study. The baseline age, BMI Z-score, internalized weight stigma, and psychological stress influenced the body weight trajectory over time. Frequent clinical follow-ups contribute to improved BMI outcomes. Future research may examine the efficacy of weight management by reducing weight stigma and psychological distress along with the outpatient care of obesity.

体重耻辱感、心理困扰和青少年肥胖饮食行为的横断面和纵向关联:临床样本。
背景和目的:青少年肥胖是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,使他们面临更高的生理和心理不良后果风险。了解影响体重管理的预测因素,特别是内化体重耻辱感、心理社会因素和饮食行为的作用,对于在纵向随访中制定有效的干预措施至关重要。材料和方法:我们从临床环境中招募了102名10至18岁的肥胖青少年。基线人口统计数据、心理社会测量,包括体重自我污名问卷(WSSQ)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),以及饮食行为量表,如三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ-R21)和饮食失调作为疾病、控制、一、脂肪、食物问卷(SCOFF),在首次访问时收集。我们进行了一项横向和纵向的研究。进行相关双变量分析,探讨关键变量之间的关系。使用广义估计方程(GEEs)作为纵向分析的一部分来调查影响BMI变化的因素。结果:参与者平均年龄13.22岁,男性占63.7%。双变量相关分析显示BMI z -评分与WSSQ评分呈正相关(r = 0.196, p < 0.05)。在双变量分析中,BMI z评分差异与就诊次数呈负相关(r = -0.428, p < 0.01)。GEE分析显示,初始BMI z -score(系数= 1.342,p < 0.001)和焦虑(系数= 0.050,p < 0.001)是BMI z -score的显著正相关预测因子,而抑郁呈负相关(系数= -0.081,p < 0.001)。排除TFEQ子量表,SCOFF提高了模型的QIC,并强调WSSQ是一个显著的,尽管弱的预测因子(在完整模型中p = 0.615,而在简化模型中p < 0.05)。结论:在这项研究中,心理社会因素,特别是焦虑和体重耻辱感,与受肥胖影响的青少年BMI z分数升高有关。基线年龄、BMI z评分、内化体重耻辱感和心理压力随时间影响体重轨迹。频繁的临床随访有助于改善BMI结果。未来的研究可能会通过减少体重耻辱感和心理困扰以及肥胖的门诊治疗来检验体重管理的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信