Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Bladder Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alexandru Nesiu, Dorin Novacescu, Silviu Latcu, Razvan Bardan, Alin Cumpanas, Flavia Zara, Victor Buciu, Radu Caprariu, Talida Georgiana Cut, Ademir Horia Stana
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Bladder Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alexandru Nesiu, Dorin Novacescu, Silviu Latcu, Razvan Bardan, Alin Cumpanas, Flavia Zara, Victor Buciu, Radu Caprariu, Talida Georgiana Cut, Ademir Horia Stana","doi":"10.3390/medicina61030469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) represents a standardized approach for interpreting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in bladder cancer (BC) evaluation. This systematic review aimed to assess the VI-RADS' diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in distinguishing muscle-invasive from non-muscle-invasive BC, a crucial differentiation for treatment planning. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, over an initial five-year time span, from VI-RADS' inception (May 2018) to November 2023. Studies reporting VI-RADS' diagnostic performance with histopathological confirmation and interobserver agreement data were included. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, while interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ coefficient. <i>Results</i>: Nine studies comprising 1249 participants met the inclusion criteria. Using a VI-RADS score cutoff of ≥3, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting muscle invasion were 88.2% and 80.6%, respectively. Interobserver agreement showed excellent consistency with a mean κ value of 0.82. Individual study sensitivities ranged from 74.1% to 94.6%, while specificities varied from 43.9% to 96.5%. <i>Conclusions</i>: VI-RADS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement in BC staging, supporting its role as a reliable non-invasive diagnostic tool. However, it should be used as a complementary tool to, not a replacement for, histopathological confirmation. Moreover, the variability in specificity suggests the need for standardized training and interpretation protocols. Clinical correlation and adequate reader experience are essential for optimal implementation. Future integration with pathological data may further enhance its predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) represents a standardized approach for interpreting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) in bladder cancer (BC) evaluation. This systematic review aimed to assess the VI-RADS' diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in distinguishing muscle-invasive from non-muscle-invasive BC, a crucial differentiation for treatment planning. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, over an initial five-year time span, from VI-RADS' inception (May 2018) to November 2023. Studies reporting VI-RADS' diagnostic performance with histopathological confirmation and interobserver agreement data were included. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, while interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ coefficient. Results: Nine studies comprising 1249 participants met the inclusion criteria. Using a VI-RADS score cutoff of ≥3, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting muscle invasion were 88.2% and 80.6%, respectively. Interobserver agreement showed excellent consistency with a mean κ value of 0.82. Individual study sensitivities ranged from 74.1% to 94.6%, while specificities varied from 43.9% to 96.5%. Conclusions: VI-RADS demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement in BC staging, supporting its role as a reliable non-invasive diagnostic tool. However, it should be used as a complementary tool to, not a replacement for, histopathological confirmation. Moreover, the variability in specificity suggests the need for standardized training and interpretation protocols. Clinical correlation and adequate reader experience are essential for optimal implementation. Future integration with pathological data may further enhance its predictive value.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信