Factors Influencing Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Outcomes for Corneal Thinning and Perforation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anjali Om, Anjali Badami, Yuqing Wang, Xiangqin Cui, Soroosh Behshad, Joung Kim, Praneetha Thulasi
{"title":"Factors Influencing Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Outcomes for Corneal Thinning and Perforation.","authors":"Anjali Om, Anjali Badami, Yuqing Wang, Xiangqin Cui, Soroosh Behshad, Joung Kim, Praneetha Thulasi","doi":"10.3390/medicina61030492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: To report the outcomes of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA) in patients with corneal perforations and thinning. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A retrospective interventional study of 83 eyes treated with CTA for corneal thinning or perforation at a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Primary endpoints leading to CTA failure, visual acuity, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. <i>Results</i>: At presentation, 55 (66%) had frank perforations and 28 (34%) had thinning or desmetocele. Univariate analysis showed that only multiple CTA applications were associated with CTA failure (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Multivariate analysis did not show any statistically significant variables associated with CTA failure. No variables were associated with the need for future surgery at 30 days or any further point. Older patients (<i>p</i> = 0.005), use of topical steroids before gluing (<i>p</i> = 0.03), corneal thinning (vs. perforation) (<i>p</i> = 0.02), location of pathology (<i>p</i> = 0.048), and multiple CTA applications (<i>p</i> = 0.046) were associated with worse visual outcomes in univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (OR 1.05) and use of topical steroids before gluing (OR 3.84) showed higher odds, and systemic immunosuppression (OR 0.08) and single (versus multiple) CTA application (OR 0.11) showed lower odds of worse visual acuity (BCVA ≥ 20/200). The presence of an anterior chamber prior to gluing was associated with spontaneous dislocation of CTA (<i>p</i> = 0.015). Spontaneous dislocation versus manual removal of glue was not associated with final visual acuity (<i>p</i> = 0.7), nor was duration of glue on the cornea (<i>p</i> = 0.2). <i>Conclusions</i>: CTA remains a mainstay of management in patients with corneal thinning or perforation. Only multiple CTA applications were associated with CTA failure, and duration of glue on the cornea was not associated with final visual acuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To report the outcomes of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA) in patients with corneal perforations and thinning. Materials and Methods: A retrospective interventional study of 83 eyes treated with CTA for corneal thinning or perforation at a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Primary endpoints leading to CTA failure, visual acuity, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results: At presentation, 55 (66%) had frank perforations and 28 (34%) had thinning or desmetocele. Univariate analysis showed that only multiple CTA applications were associated with CTA failure (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis did not show any statistically significant variables associated with CTA failure. No variables were associated with the need for future surgery at 30 days or any further point. Older patients (p = 0.005), use of topical steroids before gluing (p = 0.03), corneal thinning (vs. perforation) (p = 0.02), location of pathology (p = 0.048), and multiple CTA applications (p = 0.046) were associated with worse visual outcomes in univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (OR 1.05) and use of topical steroids before gluing (OR 3.84) showed higher odds, and systemic immunosuppression (OR 0.08) and single (versus multiple) CTA application (OR 0.11) showed lower odds of worse visual acuity (BCVA ≥ 20/200). The presence of an anterior chamber prior to gluing was associated with spontaneous dislocation of CTA (p = 0.015). Spontaneous dislocation versus manual removal of glue was not associated with final visual acuity (p = 0.7), nor was duration of glue on the cornea (p = 0.2). Conclusions: CTA remains a mainstay of management in patients with corneal thinning or perforation. Only multiple CTA applications were associated with CTA failure, and duration of glue on the cornea was not associated with final visual acuity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信