The pretesting effect under divided attention.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Johannes Bartl, Oliver Kliegl, Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
{"title":"The pretesting effect under divided attention.","authors":"Johannes Bartl, Oliver Kliegl, Karl-Heinz T Bäuml","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02106-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Completing a pretest (e.g., star-?) before receiving correct-answer feedback (e.g., star-night) can improve long-term retention of the material compared to material that was initially only studied. The present study examined whether this pretesting effect requires attentional resources during the initial pretest stage and the subsequent feedback stage. Two experiments were conducted in which participants studied word pairs which were either presented in full for 12 s and thus could be studied immediately (study-only trials) or were first only presented with the cue word of a pair and asked to guess the target word for 6 s before the complete pair was shown for another 6 s (pretest trials). Critically, learning occurred either under full attention or under distraction by a secondary task, with the distraction occurring either during the first 6 s or the last 6 s of a trial. While results showed the typical pretesting effect in the absence of any distraction, the effect remained intact when distraction occurred during the first 6 s of a pretest trial, but was eliminated when distraction occurred during the last 6 s. This pattern of results arose when distraction induced material-general (Experiment 1) and when it induced material-specific (Experiment 2) interference. Consistently, additional analyses showed greater recall impairments for pretested pairs when distraction occurred during Stage 2 than during Stage 1, although such impairment was present in both situations. The findings align with theoretical accounts suggesting critical roles of attentional processes for the pretesting effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 2","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02106-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Completing a pretest (e.g., star-?) before receiving correct-answer feedback (e.g., star-night) can improve long-term retention of the material compared to material that was initially only studied. The present study examined whether this pretesting effect requires attentional resources during the initial pretest stage and the subsequent feedback stage. Two experiments were conducted in which participants studied word pairs which were either presented in full for 12 s and thus could be studied immediately (study-only trials) or were first only presented with the cue word of a pair and asked to guess the target word for 6 s before the complete pair was shown for another 6 s (pretest trials). Critically, learning occurred either under full attention or under distraction by a secondary task, with the distraction occurring either during the first 6 s or the last 6 s of a trial. While results showed the typical pretesting effect in the absence of any distraction, the effect remained intact when distraction occurred during the first 6 s of a pretest trial, but was eliminated when distraction occurred during the last 6 s. This pattern of results arose when distraction induced material-general (Experiment 1) and when it induced material-specific (Experiment 2) interference. Consistently, additional analyses showed greater recall impairments for pretested pairs when distraction occurred during Stage 2 than during Stage 1, although such impairment was present in both situations. The findings align with theoretical accounts suggesting critical roles of attentional processes for the pretesting effect.

分散注意下的前测效应。
在收到正确答案反馈(如星夜)之前完成预测(如星夜),与最初只研究的材料相比,可以提高材料的长期记忆。本研究考察了这种前测效应在最初的前测阶段和随后的反馈阶段是否需要注意资源。在两个实验中,参与者研究了单词对,这些单词对要么被完整地呈现12秒,因此可以立即研究(仅研究试验),要么被首先只呈现一对单词的提示词,并被要求在6秒内猜出目标单词,然后再显示完整的一对单词(预测试试验)。至关重要的是,学习要么发生在全神贯注的情况下,要么发生在被次要任务分散注意力的情况下,分散注意力要么发生在试验的前6秒,要么发生在试验的后6秒。结果显示,在没有任何分心的情况下,典型的前测效应仍然存在,但在前测试验的前6秒发生分心时,这种效应保持不变,但在后6秒发生分心时,这种效应被消除。当注意力分散引起物质一般性干扰(实验1)和物质特异性干扰(实验2)时,这种结果模式就会出现。与此一致的是,额外的分析表明,在第二阶段发生分心时,预测试对的回忆损伤比第一阶段更大,尽管这种损伤在两种情况下都存在。这些发现与理论解释一致,表明注意过程在测试前效应中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信