Socioeconomic inequalities in social support: Examining differences in social support network satisfaction and composition among pediatric cancer caregivers.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Elizabeth G Bouchard, Mark A Prince, Christopher McCarty, R Lorraine Collins, Olle Jane Z Sahler, Paula C Vincent, Hital Patel, Susan A LaValley, Till Krenz, Julia A Devonish, Kara M Kelly
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in social support: Examining differences in social support network satisfaction and composition among pediatric cancer caregivers.","authors":"Elizabeth G Bouchard, Mark A Prince, Christopher McCarty, R Lorraine Collins, Olle Jane Z Sahler, Paula C Vincent, Hital Patel, Susan A LaValley, Till Krenz, Julia A Devonish, Kara M Kelly","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2025.2483397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social support is an important factor in shaping healthcare navigation, coping, and psychological outcomes among pediatric cancer caregivers. Socioeconomic status is positively associated with satisfaction with social support, however, less is understood about network features that contribute to these differences. Social networks are the context in which resources and support are exchanged. Networks can exacerbate inequalities by amplifying differences in access to resources. We examined satisfaction with types of social support and composition of support networks among pediatric cancer caregivers to understand how social network dynamics differ by caregiver income and educational attainment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants were caregivers of children who received cancer treatment at multiple hospital systems in New York State. All families who met eligibility requirements during the recruitment period were invited to participate in the study, and 59% of caregivers contacted enrolled in the study. We used a self-report survey to collect egocentric social network data from 107 caregivers of pediatric cancer patients. We used bivariate logistic regression to examine differences in network support by income and education. We used Bayesian Zero and One Inflated Beta (ZOIB) regression models to examine differences in network composition by income and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Income was significantly associated with satisfaction with informational, emotional, and logistical support; and for each additional income category the odds of reporting being satisfied with each type of support increased by nearly 1.5 times. There were also differences in satisfaction with informational support by education, and each additional education category was associated with a nearly 2-fold increased likelihood of satisfaction. Caregivers with higher education reported a relatively lower proportion of family/kin in their network and a relatively greater proportion of health care providers, compared to those with less education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show differences in social support satisfaction and social network composition by income and education among pediatric cancer caregivers. These results have implications for improving intervention. Creating interventions to foster social network ties and activate social support may be a promising direction for promoting health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2025.2483397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social support is an important factor in shaping healthcare navigation, coping, and psychological outcomes among pediatric cancer caregivers. Socioeconomic status is positively associated with satisfaction with social support, however, less is understood about network features that contribute to these differences. Social networks are the context in which resources and support are exchanged. Networks can exacerbate inequalities by amplifying differences in access to resources. We examined satisfaction with types of social support and composition of support networks among pediatric cancer caregivers to understand how social network dynamics differ by caregiver income and educational attainment.

Design: Participants were caregivers of children who received cancer treatment at multiple hospital systems in New York State. All families who met eligibility requirements during the recruitment period were invited to participate in the study, and 59% of caregivers contacted enrolled in the study. We used a self-report survey to collect egocentric social network data from 107 caregivers of pediatric cancer patients. We used bivariate logistic regression to examine differences in network support by income and education. We used Bayesian Zero and One Inflated Beta (ZOIB) regression models to examine differences in network composition by income and education.

Results: Income was significantly associated with satisfaction with informational, emotional, and logistical support; and for each additional income category the odds of reporting being satisfied with each type of support increased by nearly 1.5 times. There were also differences in satisfaction with informational support by education, and each additional education category was associated with a nearly 2-fold increased likelihood of satisfaction. Caregivers with higher education reported a relatively lower proportion of family/kin in their network and a relatively greater proportion of health care providers, compared to those with less education.

Conclusions: Our results show differences in social support satisfaction and social network composition by income and education among pediatric cancer caregivers. These results have implications for improving intervention. Creating interventions to foster social network ties and activate social support may be a promising direction for promoting health equity.

社会经济不平等的社会支持:检查在儿童癌症护理人员的社会支持网络满意度和组成的差异。
目的:社会支持是影响儿童癌症护理人员医疗保健导航、应对和心理结果的重要因素。社会经济地位与社会支持满意度呈正相关,然而,对促成这些差异的网络特征了解较少。社会网络是资源和支持交换的环境。网络会扩大获取资源方面的差异,从而加剧不平等。我们调查了儿童癌症照顾者对社会支持类型的满意度和支持网络的组成,以了解社会网络动态如何因照顾者收入和受教育程度而不同。设计:参与者是在纽约州多家医院系统接受癌症治疗的儿童的照顾者。所有在招募期间符合资格要求的家庭都被邀请参加研究,59%的护理人员参加了研究。我们采用自我报告调查收集107名儿童癌症患者护理人员的自我中心社交网络数据。我们使用双变量逻辑回归来检验收入和教育对网络支持的差异。我们使用贝叶斯零和一膨胀Beta (ZOIB)回归模型来检验收入和教育对网络构成的差异。结果:收入与信息、情感和后勤支持的满意度显著相关;对于每增加一个收入类别,报告对每种支持类型满意的几率增加了近1.5倍。对教育提供的信息支持的满意度也存在差异,每增加一个教育类别,满意度的可能性就增加近2倍。与受教育程度较低的护理人员相比,受过高等教育的护理人员报告说,其网络中家庭/亲属的比例相对较低,而卫生保健提供者的比例相对较高。结论:我们的研究结果显示儿童癌症护理人员的社会支持满意度和社会网络构成受收入和教育程度的影响。这些结果对改善干预措施具有启示意义。创造干预措施以促进社会网络联系和激活社会支持可能是促进卫生公平的一个有希望的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信