Addressing Multiplicity in Retinal Sensitivity Analysis: An Alternative Approach to Assessing Gene Therapy Efficacy in Inherited Retinal Diseases.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Antonio Yaghy, David G Birch, Yunchan Hwang, Edmund Luo, JungAh Jung, Darin Curtiss, Nadia K Waheed
{"title":"Addressing Multiplicity in Retinal Sensitivity Analysis: An Alternative Approach to Assessing Gene Therapy Efficacy in Inherited Retinal Diseases.","authors":"Antonio Yaghy, David G Birch, Yunchan Hwang, Edmund Luo, JungAh Jung, Darin Curtiss, Nadia K Waheed","doi":"10.1167/tvst.14.3.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to propose an alternative statistical approach that addresses the issue of multiplicity in microperimetry data analysis, offering a more balanced and sensitive measure of the efficacy of gene therapy in inherited retinal diseases (IRDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed microperimetry data from a phase II trial of AGTC-501 in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). The Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA; CenterVue, Padova, Italy) device was used to evaluate test-retest repeatability. A binomial model was used to calculate the probability of ≥7 decibel (dB) improvements due to chance alone across a 68-locus grid. We proposed an alternative approach to detect changes using a threshold of ≥7 loci with ≥7 dB mean improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest repeatability analysis showed a probability of < 5% for observing pointwise improvements ≥7 dB between 2 baseline visits. Applying the binomial distribution model, we found that the probability of observing improvements ≥7 dB in at least 7 unspecified loci purely by chance was 5.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach provides a balanced way to address multiplicity while maintaining reasonable statistical significance. Using ≥7 unspecified loci as the criterion for assessing sensitivity changes, offers a comprehensive assessment that can detect genuine treatment effects without being overly conservative.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>This alternative statistical method has the potential to improve the evaluation of retinal sensitivity changes in gene therapy trials for IRDs, providing a more accurate measure of therapeutic efficacy and enhancing clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23322,"journal":{"name":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","volume":"14 3","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.14.3.25","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to propose an alternative statistical approach that addresses the issue of multiplicity in microperimetry data analysis, offering a more balanced and sensitive measure of the efficacy of gene therapy in inherited retinal diseases (IRDs).

Methods: We analyzed microperimetry data from a phase II trial of AGTC-501 in patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). The Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA; CenterVue, Padova, Italy) device was used to evaluate test-retest repeatability. A binomial model was used to calculate the probability of ≥7 decibel (dB) improvements due to chance alone across a 68-locus grid. We proposed an alternative approach to detect changes using a threshold of ≥7 loci with ≥7 dB mean improvement.

Results: Test-retest repeatability analysis showed a probability of < 5% for observing pointwise improvements ≥7 dB between 2 baseline visits. Applying the binomial distribution model, we found that the probability of observing improvements ≥7 dB in at least 7 unspecified loci purely by chance was 5.3%.

Conclusions: The proposed approach provides a balanced way to address multiplicity while maintaining reasonable statistical significance. Using ≥7 unspecified loci as the criterion for assessing sensitivity changes, offers a comprehensive assessment that can detect genuine treatment effects without being overly conservative.

Translational relevance: This alternative statistical method has the potential to improve the evaluation of retinal sensitivity changes in gene therapy trials for IRDs, providing a more accurate measure of therapeutic efficacy and enhancing clinical decision making.

解决视网膜敏感性分析的多样性:评估遗传性视网膜疾病基因治疗疗效的另一种方法。
目的:本研究的目的是提出一种替代的统计方法,以解决显微镜测量数据分析中的多重问题,为基因治疗遗传性视网膜疾病(IRDs)的疗效提供更平衡和敏感的衡量标准。方法:我们分析了AGTC-501用于x -联性视网膜色素变性(XLRP)患者的II期临床试验的显微测量数据。黄斑完整性评估(MAIA);使用CenterVue, Padova, Italy)设备评估测试-重测重复性。一个二项模型被用来计算≥7分贝(dB)改善的概率,这是由于在68个位点的网格中单独的机会。我们提出了一种替代方法来检测变化,使用≥7个位点的阈值,平均改善≥7 dB。结果:测试-重测可重复性分析显示,在两次基线就诊之间观察到≥7 dB的点改善的概率< 5%。应用二项分布模型,我们发现在至少7个未指定的基因座中观察到≥7 dB的改善纯粹偶然的概率为5.3%。结论:提出的方法提供了一种平衡的方法来解决多样性,同时保持合理的统计显著性。使用≥7个未指定位点作为评估敏感性变化的标准,提供了一个全面的评估,可以发现真正的治疗效果,而不会过于保守。翻译相关性:这种替代的统计方法有可能改善IRDs基因治疗试验中视网膜敏感性变化的评估,提供更准确的治疗效果测量并增强临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Translational Vision Science & Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
346
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Vision Science & Technology (TVST), an official journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), an international organization whose purpose is to advance research worldwide into understanding the visual system and preventing, treating and curing its disorders, is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal emphasizing multidisciplinary research that bridges the gap between basic research and clinical care. A highly qualified and diverse group of Associate Editors and Editorial Board Members is led by Editor-in-Chief Marco Zarbin, MD, PhD, FARVO. The journal covers a broad spectrum of work, including but not limited to: Applications of stem cell technology for regenerative medicine, Development of new animal models of human diseases, Tissue bioengineering, Chemical engineering to improve virus-based gene delivery, Nanotechnology for drug delivery, Design and synthesis of artificial extracellular matrices, Development of a true microsurgical operating environment, Refining data analysis algorithms to improve in vivo imaging technology, Results of Phase 1 clinical trials, Reverse translational ("bedside to bench") research. TVST seeks manuscripts from scientists and clinicians with diverse backgrounds ranging from basic chemistry to ophthalmic surgery that will advance or change the way we understand and/or treat vision-threatening diseases. TVST encourages the use of color, multimedia, hyperlinks, program code and other digital enhancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信