Endoscopic Techniques for Colorectal Neoplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chih-Wen Huang, Hsu-Heng Yen, Yang-Yuan Chen
{"title":"Endoscopic Techniques for Colorectal Neoplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chih-Wen Huang, Hsu-Heng Yen, Yang-Yuan Chen","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) has been the preferred method for colonoscopy surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with advances in endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) techniques have emerged. This network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of different endoscopy techniques for IBD patient surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 2514 patients were included in the analysis, comparing endoscopy techniques in IBD patient surveillance: DCE, high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), standard-definition WLE, i-scan, narrow band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and autofluorescence imaging (AFI). We assessed the per patient neoplasia detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and withdrawal time between different endoscopy techniques. Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the neoplasia detection rate according to endoscopy techniques using various biopsy protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing neoplasia detection rates revealed that only DCE (OR: 2.56 [1.17-5.59]) significantly increased the neoplasia detection rate compared with standard-definition WLE. The subsequent rankings were high-definition WLE, NBI, FICE, i-scan, and AFI. Moreover, the PPVs of DCE, VCE, and high-definition WLE showed no significant difference compared with that of standard-definition WLE. However, DCE required a significantly longer withdrawal time. Subgroup analysis showed that DCE with random biopsy or target biopsy and high-definition WLE with target biopsy had superior neoplasia detection rates than standard-definition WLE with random biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCE significantly outperforms standard-definition WLE in neoplasia detection rates, with random biopsy providing additional benefits. Although DCE does not lower PPV, it requires more withdrawal time. If DCE-based surveillance is not feasible, high-definition WLE with targeted biopsy should be considered as other VCE techniques offer no significant advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) has been the preferred method for colonoscopy surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with advances in endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) techniques have emerged. This network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of different endoscopy techniques for IBD patient surveillance.

Methods: Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 2514 patients were included in the analysis, comparing endoscopy techniques in IBD patient surveillance: DCE, high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), standard-definition WLE, i-scan, narrow band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and autofluorescence imaging (AFI). We assessed the per patient neoplasia detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and withdrawal time between different endoscopy techniques. Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the neoplasia detection rate according to endoscopy techniques using various biopsy protocols.

Results: Comparing neoplasia detection rates revealed that only DCE (OR: 2.56 [1.17-5.59]) significantly increased the neoplasia detection rate compared with standard-definition WLE. The subsequent rankings were high-definition WLE, NBI, FICE, i-scan, and AFI. Moreover, the PPVs of DCE, VCE, and high-definition WLE showed no significant difference compared with that of standard-definition WLE. However, DCE required a significantly longer withdrawal time. Subgroup analysis showed that DCE with random biopsy or target biopsy and high-definition WLE with target biopsy had superior neoplasia detection rates than standard-definition WLE with random biopsy.

Conclusion: DCE significantly outperforms standard-definition WLE in neoplasia detection rates, with random biopsy providing additional benefits. Although DCE does not lower PPV, it requires more withdrawal time. If DCE-based surveillance is not feasible, high-definition WLE with targeted biopsy should be considered as other VCE techniques offer no significant advantages.

内镜技术用于炎症性肠病的结直肠肿瘤监测:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景和目的:染料染色内镜(DCE)已成为炎症性肠病(IBD)患者结肠镜检查的首选方法。然而,随着内窥镜技术的进步,虚拟色内窥镜(VCE)技术已经出现。该网络荟萃分析评估了不同内窥镜技术对IBD患者监测的有效性。方法:纳入16项随机对照试验,共纳入2514例患者,比较内镜技术在IBD患者监测中的应用:DCE、高清白光内镜(WLE)、标准清晰度内镜(WLE)、i-scan、窄带成像(NBI)、柔性光谱成像彩色增强(FICE)和自身荧光成像(AFI)。我们评估了每位患者的肿瘤检出率、阳性预测值(PPV)和不同内镜技术之间的停药时间。此外,进行亚组分析,根据不同活检方案的内镜技术调查肿瘤检出率。结果:对比肿瘤检出率,只有DCE (OR: 2.56[1.17-5.59])较标准定义WLE显著提高肿瘤检出率。随后的排名是高清WLE、NBI、office、i-scan和AFI。此外,DCE、VCE和高清WLE的ppv与标准清晰度WLE相比无显著差异。然而,DCE需要更长的提款时间。亚组分析显示随机活检的DCE或靶活检的高清晰度WLE与靶活检的高清晰度WLE相比,随机活检的标准清晰度WLE的肿瘤检出率更高。结论:DCE在肿瘤检出率上明显优于标准定义的WLE,随机活检提供了额外的好处。DCE虽然没有降低PPV,但需要更多的提现时间。如果基于dce的监测不可行,则应考虑采用靶向活检的高清WLE,因为其他VCE技术没有明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信