Effects of Surface Charge of Inhaled Liposomes on Drug Efficacy and Biocompatibility.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jinniu Zhang, Yun Huang, Wenhao Shen, Yixing Zeng, Yingjing Miao, Nianping Feng, Tianyuan Ci
{"title":"Effects of Surface Charge of Inhaled Liposomes on Drug Efficacy and Biocompatibility.","authors":"Jinniu Zhang, Yun Huang, Wenhao Shen, Yixing Zeng, Yingjing Miao, Nianping Feng, Tianyuan Ci","doi":"10.3390/pharmaceutics17030329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Liposomes are a promising drug carrier for inhaled delivery systems and their physical parameters could influence therapeutic efficacy significantly. This study was designed to answer the specific question of the proper surface charge of liposomes in pulmonary inhalation, as well as to study the synergistic anti-inflammation efficacy between drugs. <b>Methods:</b> In this work, a series of drug-loaded liposomes with different surface charges (from negative to positive) were prepared, and several in vitro and in vivo assays, including cytotoxicity, hemolysis assay, mucus penetration and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pneumonia model test, were adopted to evaluate the anti-inflammation efficacy and biocompatibility of the above liposomes. <b>Results:</b> Compared with cationic liposomes, anionic liposomes are capable of better mucus penetration and good biocompatibility (low cytotoxicity, better blood compatibility and mild tissue inflammation), but with poor cellular uptake by immune cells. In specific, even when the liposome surface charge was only +2.6 mV, its cytotoxicity and blood hemolysis reached around 20% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in biocompatibility between anionic liposomes (-25.9 vs. -2.5 mV), but a slightly negative-charged liposome exhibited better cellular uptake. <b>Conclusions:</b> Thus, slightly negative-charged liposomes (-1~-3 mV) could be a well inhaled drug carrier considering both efficacy and biocompatibility. In an LPS-induced pneumonia mouse model, the drug-loaded liposomes achieved better anti-inflammatory efficacy compared with free drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19894,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutics","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17030329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Liposomes are a promising drug carrier for inhaled delivery systems and their physical parameters could influence therapeutic efficacy significantly. This study was designed to answer the specific question of the proper surface charge of liposomes in pulmonary inhalation, as well as to study the synergistic anti-inflammation efficacy between drugs. Methods: In this work, a series of drug-loaded liposomes with different surface charges (from negative to positive) were prepared, and several in vitro and in vivo assays, including cytotoxicity, hemolysis assay, mucus penetration and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pneumonia model test, were adopted to evaluate the anti-inflammation efficacy and biocompatibility of the above liposomes. Results: Compared with cationic liposomes, anionic liposomes are capable of better mucus penetration and good biocompatibility (low cytotoxicity, better blood compatibility and mild tissue inflammation), but with poor cellular uptake by immune cells. In specific, even when the liposome surface charge was only +2.6 mV, its cytotoxicity and blood hemolysis reached around 20% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in biocompatibility between anionic liposomes (-25.9 vs. -2.5 mV), but a slightly negative-charged liposome exhibited better cellular uptake. Conclusions: Thus, slightly negative-charged liposomes (-1~-3 mV) could be a well inhaled drug carrier considering both efficacy and biocompatibility. In an LPS-induced pneumonia mouse model, the drug-loaded liposomes achieved better anti-inflammatory efficacy compared with free drugs.

吸入脂质体表面电荷对药物疗效和生物相容性的影响。
目的:脂质体是一种很有前途的药物载体,其物理参数对吸入给药系统的治疗效果有重要影响。本研究旨在回答肺吸入中脂质体的表面电荷是否合适的具体问题,并研究药物间的协同抗炎功效。方法:制备一系列表面电荷由负向正的载药脂质体,通过细胞毒性、溶血、黏液渗透、脂多糖(LPS)诱导肺炎模型试验等体外和体内实验,评价脂质体的抗炎作用和生物相容性。结果:与阳离子脂质体相比,阴离子脂质体具有更好的黏液渗透性和良好的生物相容性(细胞毒性低、血液相容性好、组织炎症轻微),但免疫细胞对阴离子脂质体的吸收能力差。其中,即使脂质体表面电荷仅为+2.6 mV时,其细胞毒性和血液溶血作用也分别达到20%和15%左右。此外,阴离子脂质体(-25.9 mV vs. -2.5 mV)的生物相容性没有显著差异,但稍带负电荷的脂质体表现出更好的细胞摄取。结论:微负电荷脂质体(-1~-3 mV)具有良好的吸入性和生物相容性。在lps诱导的肺炎小鼠模型中,与游离药物相比,载药脂质体具有更好的抗炎作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutics
Pharmaceutics Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
16.41 days
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications,  and short notes. Covered topics include pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, and pharmaceutical formulation. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical details in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信