Rebecca A Deffler, Elise Frazee, San-San L Cooley, Bradley E Dougherty
{"title":"Hard braking events in bioptic drivers with central vision impairment.","authors":"Rebecca A Deffler, Elise Frazee, San-San L Cooley, Bradley E Dougherty","doi":"10.1111/opo.13496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Some individuals with central vision impairment can obtain or maintain driving privileges using bioptic telescopes. Previous work has often demonstrated an increased collision risk for bioptic drivers, but some on-road studies find similar safety to that of normally sighted drivers. The purpose of this study was to compare exposure-controlled hard braking and speeding events measured with naturalistic recording in visually impaired bioptic drivers and normally sighted control drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Visual acuity was measured for each eye individually and through the bioptic when indicated. Contrast sensitivity was measured binocularly with the Mars chart. Binocular integrated visual fields were constructed from monocular 24-2C SITA Faster plots. A commercially available GPS recorder was installed into drivers' personal vehicles for at least 6 weeks. Total mileage, instances of hard braking, travel over 65 miles per hour (mph) and posted speed limit violations were counted. Exposure-controlled rates were calculated for each of these safety events. Driver characteristics and hard braking events were compared using median tests, and Spearman correlation was used to assess the relationships among vision measurements and driving safety events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty licensed bioptic drivers and 20 control drivers were enrolled. Bioptic drivers were significantly more likely to perform hard braking manoeuvres than controls. Among bioptic drivers, hard braking frequency was not predicted by visual acuity, contrast sensitivity or binocular integrated visual field deviation. Bioptic drivers with poorer contrast sensitivity were more likely to travel above 65 mph. Speeding events were not related to hard braking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bioptic drivers demonstrated nearly three times as many hard braking events per 1000 miles driven, but vision measurements did not predict hard braking. Bioptic drivers with poorer contrast sensitivity were more likely to drive faster than 65 mph. Further work exploring relationships among vision and driving safety in bioptic drivers is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"1186-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Some individuals with central vision impairment can obtain or maintain driving privileges using bioptic telescopes. Previous work has often demonstrated an increased collision risk for bioptic drivers, but some on-road studies find similar safety to that of normally sighted drivers. The purpose of this study was to compare exposure-controlled hard braking and speeding events measured with naturalistic recording in visually impaired bioptic drivers and normally sighted control drivers.
Methods: Visual acuity was measured for each eye individually and through the bioptic when indicated. Contrast sensitivity was measured binocularly with the Mars chart. Binocular integrated visual fields were constructed from monocular 24-2C SITA Faster plots. A commercially available GPS recorder was installed into drivers' personal vehicles for at least 6 weeks. Total mileage, instances of hard braking, travel over 65 miles per hour (mph) and posted speed limit violations were counted. Exposure-controlled rates were calculated for each of these safety events. Driver characteristics and hard braking events were compared using median tests, and Spearman correlation was used to assess the relationships among vision measurements and driving safety events.
Results: Twenty licensed bioptic drivers and 20 control drivers were enrolled. Bioptic drivers were significantly more likely to perform hard braking manoeuvres than controls. Among bioptic drivers, hard braking frequency was not predicted by visual acuity, contrast sensitivity or binocular integrated visual field deviation. Bioptic drivers with poorer contrast sensitivity were more likely to travel above 65 mph. Speeding events were not related to hard braking.
Conclusions: Bioptic drivers demonstrated nearly three times as many hard braking events per 1000 miles driven, but vision measurements did not predict hard braking. Bioptic drivers with poorer contrast sensitivity were more likely to drive faster than 65 mph. Further work exploring relationships among vision and driving safety in bioptic drivers is warranted.
目的:一些中枢性视力障碍患者可以使用双视望远镜获得或维持驾驶特权。以前的研究经常表明,视力不佳的司机发生碰撞的风险更高,但一些道路研究发现,视力正常的司机的安全性与视力正常的司机相似。本研究的目的是比较视障驾驶员和正常视力驾驶员在自然记录下的暴露控制下的急刹车和超速事件。方法:分别测量每只眼的视敏度,并根据需要通过活组织检查。对比灵敏度是用火星图双目测量的。利用单目24-2C SITA Faster图构建双目综合视野。商用GPS记录仪被安装在司机的私家车中至少6周。总里程、紧急刹车次数、时速超过65英里(mph)以及违反限速规定的情况都会被计算在内。对每一个安全事件计算暴露控制率。使用中位数检验比较驾驶员特征和硬制动事件,并使用Spearman相关来评估视觉测量与驾驶安全事件之间的关系。结果:20名持证驾驶员和20名对照驾驶员入组。与控制组相比,双视驾驶员明显更有可能进行硬制动操作。在双视驾驶员中,硬制动频率与视敏度、对比敏感度和双眼综合视野偏差无关。对比敏感度较差的双视司机更有可能以65英里/小时的速度行驶。超速事件与急刹车无关。结论:每1000英里行驶中,双视驾驶员的硬制动事件几乎是其三倍,但视觉测量并不能预测硬制动。对比敏感度较差的双视驾驶员更有可能驾驶速度超过65英里/小时。进一步研究视力与驾驶安全之间的关系是必要的。
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry.
OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.