Reinforced Fill Structure with Alternative Fill Materials: An Application of Geogrid Creep Strain Analysis Using Numerical Modeling.

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.3390/ma18061346
Ahsan Rehman Khan, Gemmina Di Emidio
{"title":"Reinforced Fill Structure with Alternative Fill Materials: An Application of Geogrid Creep Strain Analysis Using Numerical Modeling.","authors":"Ahsan Rehman Khan, Gemmina Di Emidio","doi":"10.3390/ma18061346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many years, granular fill has been the preferred fill material in reinforced fill structures (RFSs) due to its high strength and drainage properties. However, the global scarcity of granular fill has necessitated the exploration of alternative fill materials. This study aims to evaluate the performance of three different alternative fill materials: (i) weak onsite fill (fill 1), (ii) lime-stabilized onsite fill (fill 2), and (iii) recycled construction and demolition (C & D) waste (fill 3). A finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess the stability and horizontal displacement of an RFS and the long-term creep deformation of geogrid using viscoelastic (time-dependent) model in Plaxis. This RFS comprised a combination of wire mesh and geogrids, serving as primary and secondary reinforcement materials, respectively. The results indicate that fill 1, with low shear strength and stiffness, induces excessive lateral displacement and was unstable, making it unsuitable for RFS applications. In contrast, Fill 2 and Fill 3 achieve Eurocode-based safety factors of 1.12 and 1.19, respectively, while significantly reducing horizontal displacement. The long-term creep deformation analysis of geogrid in the case of fill 1 exceeds the prescribed serviceability strain limit threshold, while in the cases of fill 2 and fill 3, it conforms to the serviceability strain limit, which indicates effective mobilization of tensile resistance without excessive elongation. Finally, an analysis was conducted to optimize the geogrid length and to see its impact on cost and performance. The results revealed up to a 29% cost reduction while ensuring performance criteria. These findings validate lime-stabilized onsite fill and recycled C&D waste as viable, cost-effective alternatives to conventional granular backfill, ensuring not only stability and serviceability but also the long-term performance of geogrids in RFSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many years, granular fill has been the preferred fill material in reinforced fill structures (RFSs) due to its high strength and drainage properties. However, the global scarcity of granular fill has necessitated the exploration of alternative fill materials. This study aims to evaluate the performance of three different alternative fill materials: (i) weak onsite fill (fill 1), (ii) lime-stabilized onsite fill (fill 2), and (iii) recycled construction and demolition (C & D) waste (fill 3). A finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess the stability and horizontal displacement of an RFS and the long-term creep deformation of geogrid using viscoelastic (time-dependent) model in Plaxis. This RFS comprised a combination of wire mesh and geogrids, serving as primary and secondary reinforcement materials, respectively. The results indicate that fill 1, with low shear strength and stiffness, induces excessive lateral displacement and was unstable, making it unsuitable for RFS applications. In contrast, Fill 2 and Fill 3 achieve Eurocode-based safety factors of 1.12 and 1.19, respectively, while significantly reducing horizontal displacement. The long-term creep deformation analysis of geogrid in the case of fill 1 exceeds the prescribed serviceability strain limit threshold, while in the cases of fill 2 and fill 3, it conforms to the serviceability strain limit, which indicates effective mobilization of tensile resistance without excessive elongation. Finally, an analysis was conducted to optimize the geogrid length and to see its impact on cost and performance. The results revealed up to a 29% cost reduction while ensuring performance criteria. These findings validate lime-stabilized onsite fill and recycled C&D waste as viable, cost-effective alternatives to conventional granular backfill, ensuring not only stability and serviceability but also the long-term performance of geogrids in RFSs.

可选填土材料加筋填土结构:数值模拟在土工格栅蠕变应变分析中的应用。
多年来,颗粒填料因其高强度和高排水性能一直是加固填料结构(rfs)的首选填料。然而,由于全球颗粒填料的稀缺性,有必要探索替代填料。本研究旨在评估三种不同的替代填充物的性能:(i)弱现场填充物(填充物1),(ii)石灰稳定的现场填充物(填充物2),以及(iii)回收建筑和拆除(c&d)废物(填充物3)。采用Plaxis粘弹性(时间相关)模型进行有限元分析(FEA),以评估RFS的稳定性和水平位移以及土工格栅的长期蠕变变形。该RFS由钢丝网和土工格栅组成,分别作为初级和次级增强材料。结果表明,充填体1抗剪强度和刚度较低,侧向位移过大,不稳定,不适合RFS应用。相比之下,Fill 2和Fill 3分别达到了基于eurocode的1.12和1.19安全系数,同时显著降低了水平位移。填方1的土工格栅长期蠕变分析超过规定的使用应变极限阈值,而填方2和填方3的土工格栅则符合使用应变极限,表明在没有过度伸长的情况下有效动员了抗拉阻力。最后,进行了分析,以优化土工格栅长度,并看到其对成本和性能的影响。结果显示,在确保性能标准的同时,成本降低了29%。这些研究结果验证了石灰稳定的现场填充物和回收的C&D废物是传统颗粒充填物的可行、经济的替代品,不仅确保了rfs中土工格栅的稳定性和可使用性,而且还确保了其长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信