Dynamic Response of Buried Pressurized Pipelines When Subjected to Transverse Impact Loading: Experimental Study.

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.3390/ma18061362
Ruobing Wu, Kai Zhuang, Yuchao Yang, Zhijie Wu, Feng Liu
{"title":"Dynamic Response of Buried Pressurized Pipelines When Subjected to Transverse Impact Loading: Experimental Study.","authors":"Ruobing Wu, Kai Zhuang, Yuchao Yang, Zhijie Wu, Feng Liu","doi":"10.3390/ma18061362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the dynamic behavior of pressurized pipelines under impact loads in various burial environments. A total of 60 tests were conducted using a drop-weight impact testing apparatus, with high-speed cameras and sensors used to collect data throughout the experiments. This approach enabled a thorough investigation of the effects of the soil type, burial depth, and internal pressure on pipeline behavior. The results show that pipeline deformation decreases as burial depth and soil stiffness increase. Under similar conditions, unpressurized pipelines exhibit significantly greater plastic deformation than pressurized pipelines, indicating superior energy absorption. The application of internal pressure leads to a marked increase in the peak impact force compared to scenarios without internal pressure. Fluctuations in internal volume cause pressure variations, affecting the response of the pipeline. Additionally, higher soil stiffness results in increased peak impact force, particularly in loess environments, suggesting that stiffer soils improve pipeline impact resistance. It is important to note that deeper burial does not always lead to reduced impact forces. In stiff soil conditions, greater burial depth may even amplify the impact force. These effects are closely associated with stress concentration under impact loads, changes in soil support capacity, and the influence of internal pressure. The test data and analysis provided in this paper will contribute to optimizing pipeline design and protective strategies, thereby enhancing their safety and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the dynamic behavior of pressurized pipelines under impact loads in various burial environments. A total of 60 tests were conducted using a drop-weight impact testing apparatus, with high-speed cameras and sensors used to collect data throughout the experiments. This approach enabled a thorough investigation of the effects of the soil type, burial depth, and internal pressure on pipeline behavior. The results show that pipeline deformation decreases as burial depth and soil stiffness increase. Under similar conditions, unpressurized pipelines exhibit significantly greater plastic deformation than pressurized pipelines, indicating superior energy absorption. The application of internal pressure leads to a marked increase in the peak impact force compared to scenarios without internal pressure. Fluctuations in internal volume cause pressure variations, affecting the response of the pipeline. Additionally, higher soil stiffness results in increased peak impact force, particularly in loess environments, suggesting that stiffer soils improve pipeline impact resistance. It is important to note that deeper burial does not always lead to reduced impact forces. In stiff soil conditions, greater burial depth may even amplify the impact force. These effects are closely associated with stress concentration under impact loads, changes in soil support capacity, and the influence of internal pressure. The test data and analysis provided in this paper will contribute to optimizing pipeline design and protective strategies, thereby enhancing their safety and reliability.

埋地加压管道在横向冲击载荷作用下的动力响应:实验研究。
研究了不同埋置环境下压力管道在冲击载荷作用下的动力特性。总共进行了60次试验,使用的是落锤冲击试验装置,在整个试验过程中使用高速摄像机和传感器收集数据。这种方法能够彻底调查土壤类型、埋深和内部压力对管道行为的影响。结果表明:管道变形随埋深和土体刚度的增加而减小;在相同条件下,非加压管道的塑性变形明显大于加压管道,说明非加压管道的能量吸收更强。与没有内压的情况相比,施加内压会导致峰值冲击力的显著增加。内部体积的波动引起压力的变化,影响管道的响应。此外,土壤刚度越高,峰值冲击力越大,特别是在黄土环境中,这表明土壤刚度越高,管道抗冲击能力越强。值得注意的是,更深的埋藏并不总是导致冲击力的减小。在坚硬的土壤条件下,更大的埋藏深度甚至可能放大冲击力。这些效应与冲击荷载作用下的应力集中、土壤支护能力的变化以及内压的影响密切相关。本文提供的试验数据和分析将有助于优化管道设计和保护策略,从而提高管道的安全性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信