Comparison of online content-based training with hands-on mannequin-based skill training on basic life support knowledge and skills among medical students.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_24
Nishkarsh Gupta, Bhavik Bansal, Anju Gupta, Dhruv Jindal, Madhur Singhal, Amritesh Grewal, Maanit Matravadia, Hardik Gupta, Gyanendra Pal Singh, Arindam Choudhury, Rashmi Ramachandran, Ambuj Roy
{"title":"Comparison of online content-based training with hands-on mannequin-based skill training on basic life support knowledge and skills among medical students.","authors":"Nishkarsh Gupta, Bhavik Bansal, Anju Gupta, Dhruv Jindal, Madhur Singhal, Amritesh Grewal, Maanit Matravadia, Hardik Gupta, Gyanendra Pal Singh, Arindam Choudhury, Rashmi Ramachandran, Ambuj Roy","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac arrest remains a leading global cause of death. High-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are crucial for patient outcomes. Basic life support (BLS) training must be adequately incorporated into undergraduate training. During the pandemic-regulated restrictions, our institute started the online CPR training course for medical undergraduates so that some training could be imparted to them if they needed to staff the clinical areas. This study compared online with traditional mannequin-based CPR training regarding skill acquisition and knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized cross-sectional study involved 108 medical undergraduates divided into two groups to receive online-based training (Group 1) and mannequin-based training (Group 2). Compression depth and rate were objectively measured using an AmbuMan CPR training mannequin. Knowledge assessment was conducted using relevant clinical vignettes, and participant performance was assessed using a skill-based checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had comparable baseline knowledge. Group 2 exhibited significantly higher post intervention knowledge assessment and skill-based checklist scores. Mean compression depth [36.28 (13.84) vs 51.6 (8.7), <i>P</i> < 0.001] and median rate [110 (87.5 to 129.50) vs 123.0 (111.0 to 133.0), <i>P</i> = 0.012] were better in mannequin trained participants. Group 2 participants demonstrated superior skills across all checklist items, with notable differences in pre compression and compression steps. Scene safety checks (62%), compression rate (44%), and compression depth (48%) showed the most significant improvements, whereas steps involving Automated External Defibrillator (AED) usage had minimal enhancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study are significant, demonstrating that hands-on mannequin-based training is significantly more effective than online training in teaching BLS skills to novice medical students, particularly in achieving correct chest compression depth and rate. The study's findings indicate that hands-on training is indispensable for effective skill acquisition despite the widespread adoption of online teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest remains a leading global cause of death. High-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are crucial for patient outcomes. Basic life support (BLS) training must be adequately incorporated into undergraduate training. During the pandemic-regulated restrictions, our institute started the online CPR training course for medical undergraduates so that some training could be imparted to them if they needed to staff the clinical areas. This study compared online with traditional mannequin-based CPR training regarding skill acquisition and knowledge retention.

Materials and methods: This randomized cross-sectional study involved 108 medical undergraduates divided into two groups to receive online-based training (Group 1) and mannequin-based training (Group 2). Compression depth and rate were objectively measured using an AmbuMan CPR training mannequin. Knowledge assessment was conducted using relevant clinical vignettes, and participant performance was assessed using a skill-based checklist.

Results: Both groups had comparable baseline knowledge. Group 2 exhibited significantly higher post intervention knowledge assessment and skill-based checklist scores. Mean compression depth [36.28 (13.84) vs 51.6 (8.7), P < 0.001] and median rate [110 (87.5 to 129.50) vs 123.0 (111.0 to 133.0), P = 0.012] were better in mannequin trained participants. Group 2 participants demonstrated superior skills across all checklist items, with notable differences in pre compression and compression steps. Scene safety checks (62%), compression rate (44%), and compression depth (48%) showed the most significant improvements, whereas steps involving Automated External Defibrillator (AED) usage had minimal enhancements.

Conclusion: The findings of this study are significant, demonstrating that hands-on mannequin-based training is significantly more effective than online training in teaching BLS skills to novice medical students, particularly in achieving correct chest compression depth and rate. The study's findings indicate that hands-on training is indispensable for effective skill acquisition despite the widespread adoption of online teaching.

基于在线内容的医学生基本生命维持知识和技能培训与基于人体模型的动手技能培训的比较
背景:心脏骤停仍然是全球主要的死亡原因。在心肺复苏(CPR)过程中,高质量的胸部按压对患者的预后至关重要。基本生命支持(BLS)培训必须充分纳入本科培训。在疫情防控期间,我所为医学本科生开设了在线心肺复苏术培训课程,以便他们在临床工作时可以获得一些培训。这项研究比较了在线与传统的基于人体模型的心肺复苏术培训在技能获取和知识保留方面的差异。材料和方法:这项随机横断面研究涉及108名医学本科生,分为两组,接受基于在线的训练(第一组)和基于人体模型的训练(第二组)。使用amhuman CPR训练模型客观测量按压深度和速率。知识评估采用相关临床短片进行,参与者的表现采用基于技能的检查表进行评估。结果:两组具有可比的基线知识。第二组干预后知识评估和技能检查表得分显著高于对照组。平均压缩深度[36.28 (13.84)vs 51.6 (8.7), P < 0.001]和中位率[110 (87.5 ~ 129.50)vs 123.0 (111.0 ~ 133.0), P = 0.012]在人体模型训练的参与者中更好。第二组参与者在所有检查表项目上表现出卓越的技能,在压缩前和压缩步骤上有显著差异。现场安全检查(62%)、压缩率(44%)和压缩深度(48%)显示出最显著的改善,而涉及自动体外除颤器(AED)使用的步骤的改善最小。结论:本研究的结果具有重要意义,表明基于人体模型的动手培训在向医学新手教授BLS技能方面明显比在线培训更有效,特别是在获得正确的胸按压深度和频率方面。研究结果表明,尽管在线教学被广泛采用,但实践培训对于有效的技能习得是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信