Comparison of analgesic modalities after cesarean section: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Yimeng Jing, Shishun Zhao, Wenlai Guo, Lu Qin, Yaxin Li, Di You
{"title":"Comparison of analgesic modalities after cesarean section: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Yimeng Jing, Shishun Zhao, Wenlai Guo, Lu Qin, Yaxin Li, Di You","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures. Currently, there are many analgesic methods available after cesarean section, but the optimal analgesic method after cesarean section is not clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was used to search Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes included time to first postoperative request for analgesia, postoperative medication-supplemented analgesia, pain scores at four postoperative time points, postoperative complications (nausea and vomiting, itching, and level of sedation), and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 110 randomized controlled trials involving 8871 pregnant women were finally included. A total of 17 postoperative analgesic techniques for cesarean delivery were included. Compared with the control group, all modalities except wound infiltration prolonged the time to the first request for analgesia. Transversal abdominal block-type and lumbar quadratus block-type analgesia were effective in decreasing the need for opioids in postoperative patients. Wound infiltration and transverse fascial block decreased the need for nonopioid medications in postoperative patients. The traditional analgesic modalities of intrathecal morphine (IM) and epidural morphine have the best analgesic effect, and the analgesic effect of the type of transversal abdominal block and the type of lumbar square muscle block in local anesthesia is better than that of other local anesthesia modalities. The lateral transversus abdominis block and posterior and anterior lumbar square muscle block can effectively reduce postoperative complications with the best effect. In terms of patient satisfaction, IM with conventional Petit transverse abdominal block was the best.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional nerve block is a safe and effective postoperative analgesic modality; QLB III, which is used to use opioids as postoperative supplemental analgesia, is the safest and most effective analgesic modality, and those who are used to use non-opioids as postoperative supplemental analgesia can choose transversus fasciae block as a postoperative analgesic modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures. Currently, there are many analgesic methods available after cesarean section, but the optimal analgesic method after cesarean section is not clear.

Methods: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was used to search Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes included time to first postoperative request for analgesia, postoperative medication-supplemented analgesia, pain scores at four postoperative time points, postoperative complications (nausea and vomiting, itching, and level of sedation), and patient satisfaction.

Result: A total of 110 randomized controlled trials involving 8871 pregnant women were finally included. A total of 17 postoperative analgesic techniques for cesarean delivery were included. Compared with the control group, all modalities except wound infiltration prolonged the time to the first request for analgesia. Transversal abdominal block-type and lumbar quadratus block-type analgesia were effective in decreasing the need for opioids in postoperative patients. Wound infiltration and transverse fascial block decreased the need for nonopioid medications in postoperative patients. The traditional analgesic modalities of intrathecal morphine (IM) and epidural morphine have the best analgesic effect, and the analgesic effect of the type of transversal abdominal block and the type of lumbar square muscle block in local anesthesia is better than that of other local anesthesia modalities. The lateral transversus abdominis block and posterior and anterior lumbar square muscle block can effectively reduce postoperative complications with the best effect. In terms of patient satisfaction, IM with conventional Petit transverse abdominal block was the best.

Conclusions: Regional nerve block is a safe and effective postoperative analgesic modality; QLB III, which is used to use opioids as postoperative supplemental analgesia, is the safest and most effective analgesic modality, and those who are used to use non-opioids as postoperative supplemental analgesia can choose transversus fasciae block as a postoperative analgesic modality.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信