Shirley van de Velde, Christine L van Velzen, Peter G Scheffer, Aebele B Mink van der Molen
{"title":"Organization of Prenatal Care in Orofacial Clefts and Suspected Robin Sequence: A European Survey.","authors":"Shirley van de Velde, Christine L van Velzen, Peter G Scheffer, Aebele B Mink van der Molen","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in prenatal imaging and genetic testing have improved the detection of orofacial anomalies, allowing for early diagnosis and comprehensive counseling. This study aims to provide an overview of current prenatal care practices for orofacial clefts and/or suspected Robin sequence (RS) across European countries and to identify disparities to inform future improvements. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care professionals affiliated with the European Reference Network CRANIO, collecting data on prenatal imaging, genetic testing, counseling, and termination of pregnancy. Responses were obtained from 31 health care professionals in 27 hospitals across 17 European countries. All participating countries have some sort of prenatal screening program. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1 or 2 timepoints during pregnancy, with varying techniques used to assess orofacial structures. Fetal MRI was performed in 59% of centers, primarily for multiple (severe) anomalies. Centers utilizing specific imaging techniques reported fewer missed diagnoses. Prenatal genetic testing was available in 96% of centers, with array-based copy number variation and whole-exome sequencing performed in 59% and 52% of centers, respectively. Nearly half of the centers provided multidisciplinary counseling, with team composition and session frequency varying widely. Pregnancy termination for orofacial clefts or micro-/retrognathia was not legal in 7 countries. Termination rates and trends differed across centers. In conclusion, variability exists in prenatal care for orofacial clefts and/or suspected RS across Europe, particularly in imaging techniques, genetic testing, and pregnancy termination practices. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and equitable access to multidisciplinary care to optimize outcomes for affected pregnancies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.