Impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative fatigue in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Xinghe Wang, Meiyan Zhou, Qian Liu, Fangming Shen, Zhe Zhang, Long Wang, Yu Qi, Jia Sun, Liwei Wang
{"title":"Impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block on postoperative fatigue in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Xinghe Wang, Meiyan Zhou, Qian Liu, Fangming Shen, Zhe Zhang, Long Wang, Yu Qi, Jia Sun, Liwei Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is a common yet often under-recognized consequence of surgical interventions, particularly in cardiac surgery. POFS is associated with prolonged recovery times, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Current strategies for preventing POFS have demonstrated limited success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) on the incidence of POFS in elderly patients undergoing off-pumpcoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 110 elderly patients scheduled for off-pump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to either the PIFB group (n = 55; 0.4% ropivacaine) or the control group (n = 55; normal saline). The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS, which was assessed using the ICFS-10 scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, extubation time, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POFS was significantly lower in the PIFB group compared to the control group on postoperative days 1 (69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004), 3 (63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030), and 5 (52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048), with no significant differences observed by day 7 and 8 weeks. Pain scores were also markedly lower in the PIFB group at three time points: immediately after extubation, 12 hours post-surgery, and 24 hours post-surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, opioid consumption was reduced by an average of 11.1 mg (P < 0.001). Patients in the PIFB group experienced significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 ± 1.8 hours vs. 8.6 ± 2.1 hours, P < 0.001), ICU stays (31.8 ± 7.3 hours vs. 39.4 ± 7.5 hours, P < 0.001), and hospital stays (8.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.007). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the PIFB group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.037, respectively). Notably, no PIFB-related adverse events were reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIFB significantly alleviated early POFS, enhanced pain management, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated recovery, thereby improving the overall quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing off-pump CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative fatigue syndrome (POFS) is a common yet often under-recognized consequence of surgical interventions, particularly in cardiac surgery. POFS is associated with prolonged recovery times, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Current strategies for preventing POFS have demonstrated limited success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) on the incidence of POFS in elderly patients undergoing off-pumpcoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 110 elderly patients scheduled for off-pump CABG surgery were randomly assigned to either the PIFB group (n = 55; 0.4% ropivacaine) or the control group (n = 55; normal saline). The primary outcome was the incidence of POFS, which was assessed using the ICFS-10 scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, extubation time, duration of ICU and hospital stay, and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.

Results: The incidence of POFS was significantly lower in the PIFB group compared to the control group on postoperative days 1 (69.0% vs. 92.7%, P = 0.004), 3 (63.6% vs. 83.6%, P = 0.030), and 5 (52.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.048), with no significant differences observed by day 7 and 8 weeks. Pain scores were also markedly lower in the PIFB group at three time points: immediately after extubation, 12 hours post-surgery, and 24 hours post-surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Furthermore, opioid consumption was reduced by an average of 11.1 mg (P < 0.001). Patients in the PIFB group experienced significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 ± 1.8 hours vs. 8.6 ± 2.1 hours, P < 0.001), ICU stays (31.8 ± 7.3 hours vs. 39.4 ± 7.5 hours, P < 0.001), and hospital stays (8.2 ± 1.1 days vs. 8.8 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.007). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the PIFB group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.037, respectively). Notably, no PIFB-related adverse events were reported in either group.

Conclusions: PIFB significantly alleviated early POFS, enhanced pain management, reduced opioid consumption, and accelerated recovery, thereby improving the overall quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing off-pump CABG.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信