Marginal bone loss and associated factors in immediate dental implants: a retrospective clinical study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Federico Rehberger Bescós, Ángel-Orión Salgado Peralvo, Cintia M Chamorro Petronacci, Dumitru Chele, Fabio Camacho Alonso, David Peñarrocha Oltra, Óscar Lado Baleato, Mario Pérez Sayáns
{"title":"Marginal bone loss and associated factors in immediate dental implants: a retrospective clinical study.","authors":"Federico Rehberger Bescós, Ángel-Orión Salgado Peralvo, Cintia M Chamorro Petronacci, Dumitru Chele, Fabio Camacho Alonso, David Peñarrocha Oltra, Óscar Lado Baleato, Mario Pérez Sayáns","doi":"10.1186/s40729-025-00602-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal bone loss (MBL) over a follow-up period of up to 36 months in Immediate dental implants (IDIs), as well as the impact of various clinical variables on the MBL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IDIs placed in two surgical phases were evaluated. Implants were classified into bone loss (BL, exposed threads), bone remodeling (BR, crestal bone at the implant margin ± 0.1 mm), and bone overlapping (BO, bone above the abutment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,040 IDIs were inserted in 344 patients with a successful osseointegration rate of 98.9%. The average MBL at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was - 0.3 ± - 1.0 mm, - 1.1 ± -1.8 mm, - 1.4 ± - 1.8 mm, - 1.7 ± - 1.9 mm, and - 1.3 ± - 2.3 mm, respectively. In the Baseline-12-month period, 17.5% of the IDIs presented BL, 9% BR, and 73.5% BO. For the B1-12 month period, 19.8% presented BL, 10.7% BR, and 69.5% BO. Mixed regression models showed significant MBL overtime pre-loading (p < 0.0001), stabilizing at 8.5 months from implantation. Immediate mandibular implants had lower MBL (p = 0.0365). Post-loading, MBL was lower in the mandible (p = 0.0095) and positively influenced by abutment height and rotational abutments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study supports the clinical efficacy of the IDIs placement protocol with high survival rates and acceptable MBL. It is recommended to place bone level implants slightly below the crest to ensure the platform remains at an optimal depth during the initial bone remodeling phase post-implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00602-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal bone loss (MBL) over a follow-up period of up to 36 months in Immediate dental implants (IDIs), as well as the impact of various clinical variables on the MBL.

Methods: IDIs placed in two surgical phases were evaluated. Implants were classified into bone loss (BL, exposed threads), bone remodeling (BR, crestal bone at the implant margin ± 0.1 mm), and bone overlapping (BO, bone above the abutment).

Results: A total of 1,040 IDIs were inserted in 344 patients with a successful osseointegration rate of 98.9%. The average MBL at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was - 0.3 ± - 1.0 mm, - 1.1 ± -1.8 mm, - 1.4 ± - 1.8 mm, - 1.7 ± - 1.9 mm, and - 1.3 ± - 2.3 mm, respectively. In the Baseline-12-month period, 17.5% of the IDIs presented BL, 9% BR, and 73.5% BO. For the B1-12 month period, 19.8% presented BL, 10.7% BR, and 69.5% BO. Mixed regression models showed significant MBL overtime pre-loading (p < 0.0001), stabilizing at 8.5 months from implantation. Immediate mandibular implants had lower MBL (p = 0.0365). Post-loading, MBL was lower in the mandible (p = 0.0095) and positively influenced by abutment height and rotational abutments.

Conclusions: The present study supports the clinical efficacy of the IDIs placement protocol with high survival rates and acceptable MBL. It is recommended to place bone level implants slightly below the crest to ensure the platform remains at an optimal depth during the initial bone remodeling phase post-implantation.

即刻种植牙的边缘骨丢失及相关因素:回顾性临床研究。
目的:本研究的目的是在长达36个月的随访期间评估即刻种植体(IDIs)的边缘骨丢失(MBL),以及各种临床变量对MBL的影响。方法:对两个手术阶段放置的IDIs进行评价。种植体分为骨丢失(BL,露丝)、骨重塑(BR,种植体缘±0.1 mm嵴骨)和骨重叠(BO,基台以上骨)。结果:344例患者共植入idi 1040个,骨整合成功率为98.9%。平均MBL在2、6、12、24、36个月- 0.3±1.0毫米,1.1±-1.8毫米,- 1.4±1.8毫米- 1.7±1.9毫米- 1.3±2.3毫米,分别。在基线12个月期间,17.5%的idi患者出现BL, 9%出现BR, 73.5%出现BO。在B1-12个月期间,19.8%为BL, 10.7%为BR, 69.5%为BO。结论:本研究支持IDIs放置方案的临床疗效,具有高生存率和可接受的MBL。建议将骨水平种植体放置在略低于嵴的位置,以确保在种植后的初始骨重塑阶段平台保持在最佳深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信