{"title":"Outcomes of localized corneal collagen crosslinking with a conventional device in progressive keratoconus.","authors":"Ofri Vorobichik Berar, Rachel Shemesh, Nir Gomel, Yoav Berger, Irina S Barequet","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06803-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of localized crosslinking (L-CXL) for progressive keratoconus utilizing a standard CXL device.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with a localized cone-centered CXL (based on corneal topography) using the accelerated CXL protocol with a standard CXL device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We Identified 24consecutive eyes. The average BDVA before CXL was 0.282 ± 0.35 LogMar, remained overall stable at 12-month post-surgery at 0.204 ± 0.173 LogMar (P = 0.395). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in BDVA at 12 months of 1-4 lines and none of the other eyes lost BDVA. These eyes had significantly lower pre-operative BDVA than the stable eyes (P = 0.034). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in K-max at 12 months post-operatively, of at least 1D; six of these eyes had improvement in both BDVA and Kmax. None of the eyes developed an increase in Kmax throughout the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this series, cone-centered L-CXL, using a conventional CXL device resulted in significant stabilization and even improvements in BDVA and Kmax in almost half of the eyes, without significant adverse events. Addressing the CXL application onto the affected area results in beneficial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06803-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of localized crosslinking (L-CXL) for progressive keratoconus utilizing a standard CXL device.
Design: This retrospective cohort study.
Methods: included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with a localized cone-centered CXL (based on corneal topography) using the accelerated CXL protocol with a standard CXL device.
Results: We Identified 24consecutive eyes. The average BDVA before CXL was 0.282 ± 0.35 LogMar, remained overall stable at 12-month post-surgery at 0.204 ± 0.173 LogMar (P = 0.395). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in BDVA at 12 months of 1-4 lines and none of the other eyes lost BDVA. These eyes had significantly lower pre-operative BDVA than the stable eyes (P = 0.034). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in K-max at 12 months post-operatively, of at least 1D; six of these eyes had improvement in both BDVA and Kmax. None of the eyes developed an increase in Kmax throughout the follow-up.
Conclusion: In this series, cone-centered L-CXL, using a conventional CXL device resulted in significant stabilization and even improvements in BDVA and Kmax in almost half of the eyes, without significant adverse events. Addressing the CXL application onto the affected area results in beneficial results.
期刊介绍:
Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.