Outcomes of localized corneal collagen crosslinking with a conventional device in progressive keratoconus.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ofri Vorobichik Berar, Rachel Shemesh, Nir Gomel, Yoav Berger, Irina S Barequet
{"title":"Outcomes of localized corneal collagen crosslinking with a conventional device in progressive keratoconus.","authors":"Ofri Vorobichik Berar, Rachel Shemesh, Nir Gomel, Yoav Berger, Irina S Barequet","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06803-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of localized crosslinking (L-CXL) for progressive keratoconus utilizing a standard CXL device.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with a localized cone-centered CXL (based on corneal topography) using the accelerated CXL protocol with a standard CXL device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We Identified 24consecutive eyes. The average BDVA before CXL was 0.282 ± 0.35 LogMar, remained overall stable at 12-month post-surgery at 0.204 ± 0.173 LogMar (P = 0.395). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in BDVA at 12 months of 1-4 lines and none of the other eyes lost BDVA. These eyes had significantly lower pre-operative BDVA than the stable eyes (P = 0.034). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in K-max at 12 months post-operatively, of at least 1D; six of these eyes had improvement in both BDVA and Kmax. None of the eyes developed an increase in Kmax throughout the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this series, cone-centered L-CXL, using a conventional CXL device resulted in significant stabilization and even improvements in BDVA and Kmax in almost half of the eyes, without significant adverse events. Addressing the CXL application onto the affected area results in beneficial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06803-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of localized crosslinking (L-CXL) for progressive keratoconus utilizing a standard CXL device.

Design: This retrospective cohort study.

Methods: included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with a localized cone-centered CXL (based on corneal topography) using the accelerated CXL protocol with a standard CXL device.

Results: We Identified 24consecutive eyes. The average BDVA before CXL was 0.282 ± 0.35 LogMar, remained overall stable at 12-month post-surgery at 0.204 ± 0.173 LogMar (P = 0.395). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in BDVA at 12 months of 1-4 lines and none of the other eyes lost BDVA. These eyes had significantly lower pre-operative BDVA than the stable eyes (P = 0.034). Ten eyes (of eight patients) (42%) demonstrated an improvement in K-max at 12 months post-operatively, of at least 1D; six of these eyes had improvement in both BDVA and Kmax. None of the eyes developed an increase in Kmax throughout the follow-up.

Conclusion: In this series, cone-centered L-CXL, using a conventional CXL device resulted in significant stabilization and even improvements in BDVA and Kmax in almost half of the eyes, without significant adverse events. Addressing the CXL application onto the affected area results in beneficial results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信