Aggressive subtypes in basal cell carcinomas might need different treatment and follow-up due to the higher risk of surgically uncontrollable recurrences.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Svenja Rebecca Sonntag, Rebecca Beach, Stefanie Gniesmer, Joyce Tohme, Salvatore Grisanti, Armin Mohi, Sara Hsin-Yi Yang, Vinodh Kakkassery
{"title":"Aggressive subtypes in basal cell carcinomas might need different treatment and follow-up due to the higher risk of surgically uncontrollable recurrences.","authors":"Svenja Rebecca Sonntag, Rebecca Beach, Stefanie Gniesmer, Joyce Tohme, Salvatore Grisanti, Armin Mohi, Sara Hsin-Yi Yang, Vinodh Kakkassery","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06807-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant tumor of the eyelid and recurrences of BCC may lead to massive destruction of the orbital region. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors for surgically difficult-to-control or uncontrollable recurrences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All BCCs of the periorbital region treated in the Department of Dermatology or Ophthalmology between 2011 and 2021 were included in a retrospective single center study and divided into a group of primary BCCs (pBCCs) and a group of recurrent BCCs (rBCCs). The following risk factors were compared between the two groups using the Chi<sup>2</sup> test: tumor localization, histological subtype and presence of R1 situation. Furthermore, difference in severity of reconstruction between pBCCs and rBCCs was analyzed. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 474 pBCCs and 33 rBCCs were included in this retrospective analysis. Both R1 status (p < 0.001) and aggressive subtype (p = 0.028) were significant risk factors for recurrence. The two most frequent reasons for R1 were the patient's rejection of further surgical intervention (n = 4) and the fact that the surgery was not performed at a specialized center (n = 6). In 10 of the 33 rBCCs, a further recurrence occurred despite R0 status and all 10 cases showed an aggressive subtype (p = 0.020). In all BCCs with R1 status, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate regarding the subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show the impact of incomplete tumor resection and aggressive subtype on patient outcome after BCC surgery. We suggest that the aggressiveness of the BCC may be the precondition for multiple recurring BCCs. Furthermore, especially patients who underwent surgery outside our Departments showed R1 situations and rBCCs. Therefore, personalized treatment and follow-up care as well as efforts to avoid high-risk recurrences with aggressive subtypes are necessary to improve long-term success after surgery and should be conducted by a specialized center.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06807-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant tumor of the eyelid and recurrences of BCC may lead to massive destruction of the orbital region. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors for surgically difficult-to-control or uncontrollable recurrences.

Methods: All BCCs of the periorbital region treated in the Department of Dermatology or Ophthalmology between 2011 and 2021 were included in a retrospective single center study and divided into a group of primary BCCs (pBCCs) and a group of recurrent BCCs (rBCCs). The following risk factors were compared between the two groups using the Chi2 test: tumor localization, histological subtype and presence of R1 situation. Furthermore, difference in severity of reconstruction between pBCCs and rBCCs was analyzed. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Data from 474 pBCCs and 33 rBCCs were included in this retrospective analysis. Both R1 status (p < 0.001) and aggressive subtype (p = 0.028) were significant risk factors for recurrence. The two most frequent reasons for R1 were the patient's rejection of further surgical intervention (n = 4) and the fact that the surgery was not performed at a specialized center (n = 6). In 10 of the 33 rBCCs, a further recurrence occurred despite R0 status and all 10 cases showed an aggressive subtype (p = 0.020). In all BCCs with R1 status, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate regarding the subtype.

Conclusion: Our results show the impact of incomplete tumor resection and aggressive subtype on patient outcome after BCC surgery. We suggest that the aggressiveness of the BCC may be the precondition for multiple recurring BCCs. Furthermore, especially patients who underwent surgery outside our Departments showed R1 situations and rBCCs. Therefore, personalized treatment and follow-up care as well as efforts to avoid high-risk recurrences with aggressive subtypes are necessary to improve long-term success after surgery and should be conducted by a specialized center.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信