Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration of the lungs, and bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing used in diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats: 14 dogs and 2 cats (2009-2021).

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fvets.2025.1521793
Aleksandra Preibisz, Claudia Sabine Schwedes
{"title":"Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration of the lungs, and bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing used in diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats: 14 dogs and 2 cats (2009-2021).","authors":"Aleksandra Preibisz, Claudia Sabine Schwedes","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1521793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration of the lungs (TFNA) combined with positive bacterial culture is used less frequently than airway lavage in diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats. This retrospective study evaluated TFNA results and bacterial culture findings in 14 dogs (1 dog twice) and two cats with bacterial pneumonia. Bacterial culture yielded positive results in 9/16 (56.3%) of samples. Only 1/11 (9.1%) of isolated bacterial species showed resistance to empiric treatment (amoxicillin with clavulanate). Six patients without prior antimicrobial treatment had negative bacterial cultures, despite the presence of intracellular bacteria on cytology samples. For patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia, we should consider performing both cytological examination and bacterial culture of lung aspirates, with careful interpretation of the results. Bacterial culture should be considered regardless of ongoing or previous antibiotic treatment, and even in cases where intracellular bacteria are not identified on cytology. Based on our antimicrobial susceptibility findings, first-line empirical treatment with amoxicillin with clavulanate might be an appropriate choice in most of cases regardless of the previous treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1521793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1521793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration of the lungs (TFNA) combined with positive bacterial culture is used less frequently than airway lavage in diagnosing bacterial pneumonia in dogs and cats. This retrospective study evaluated TFNA results and bacterial culture findings in 14 dogs (1 dog twice) and two cats with bacterial pneumonia. Bacterial culture yielded positive results in 9/16 (56.3%) of samples. Only 1/11 (9.1%) of isolated bacterial species showed resistance to empiric treatment (amoxicillin with clavulanate). Six patients without prior antimicrobial treatment had negative bacterial cultures, despite the presence of intracellular bacteria on cytology samples. For patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia, we should consider performing both cytological examination and bacterial culture of lung aspirates, with careful interpretation of the results. Bacterial culture should be considered regardless of ongoing or previous antibiotic treatment, and even in cases where intracellular bacteria are not identified on cytology. Based on our antimicrobial susceptibility findings, first-line empirical treatment with amoxicillin with clavulanate might be an appropriate choice in most of cases regardless of the previous treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Frontiers in Veterinary Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1870
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy. Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field. Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信