A dyad approach to understanding relationship satisfaction and health outcomes in military couples following service member and veteran traumatic brain injury.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1465801
Tracey A Brickell, Brian J Ivins, Megan M Wright, Jamie K Sullivan, Louis M French, Rael T Lange
{"title":"A dyad approach to understanding relationship satisfaction and health outcomes in military couples following service member and veteran traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Tracey A Brickell, Brian J Ivins, Megan M Wright, Jamie K Sullivan, Louis M French, Rael T Lange","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1465801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using a dyadic approach, this study examined health and family outcomes in military couples following service member and veteran (SMV) traumatic brain injury (TBI), within the context of relationship satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 164 dyads (<i>N</i> = 328), composed of US SMVs (<i>n</i> = 164) and their intimate partners (IPs, <i>n</i> = 164). Dyads completed a measure of relationship satisfaction, as well as measures of psychological, social, caregiving, family, neurobehavioral, and/or PTSD outcomes. Dyads were classified into four relationship satisfaction groups: (1) SMV and IP satisfied (Both Satisfied, <i>n</i> = 72 dyads), (2) SMV satisfied and IP dissatisfied (SMV<sub>sat</sub>/IP<sub>dis</sub>, <i>n</i> = 25 dyads), (3) SMV dissatisfied and IP satisfied (SMV<sub>dis</sub>/IP<sub>sat</sub>, <i>n</i> = 21 dyads), and (4) SMV and IP dissatisfied (Both Dissatisfied, <i>n</i> = 46 dyads).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within dyads, SMVs reported worse scores than their IPs, except in the SMV<sub>sat</sub>/IP<sub>dis</sub> group, where their dissatisfied IPs reported worse scores on four measures. Across groups, dissatisfied SMVs reported worse scores compared to satisfied SMVs, and dissatisfied IPs reported worse scores compared to satisfied IPs. Satisfied and dissatisfied SMVs and IPs in the mixed relationship satisfaction groups reported little to no differences across measures compared to their respective SMVs and IPs in the Both Satisfied and Both Dissatisfied groups, with the exception of the family measures for dissatisfied SMVs or IPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relationship dissatisfaction was related to worse health and family outcomes, even when the other members of the dyad reported satisfaction in their relationship. A dual-goal, dyadic approach to TBI treatment that focuses on how individual, couple, and family factors interact will likely maximize service member recovery and return to duty, as well as outcomes for military families.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1465801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1465801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Using a dyadic approach, this study examined health and family outcomes in military couples following service member and veteran (SMV) traumatic brain injury (TBI), within the context of relationship satisfaction.

Methods: Participants included 164 dyads (N = 328), composed of US SMVs (n = 164) and their intimate partners (IPs, n = 164). Dyads completed a measure of relationship satisfaction, as well as measures of psychological, social, caregiving, family, neurobehavioral, and/or PTSD outcomes. Dyads were classified into four relationship satisfaction groups: (1) SMV and IP satisfied (Both Satisfied, n = 72 dyads), (2) SMV satisfied and IP dissatisfied (SMVsat/IPdis, n = 25 dyads), (3) SMV dissatisfied and IP satisfied (SMVdis/IPsat, n = 21 dyads), and (4) SMV and IP dissatisfied (Both Dissatisfied, n = 46 dyads).

Results: Within dyads, SMVs reported worse scores than their IPs, except in the SMVsat/IPdis group, where their dissatisfied IPs reported worse scores on four measures. Across groups, dissatisfied SMVs reported worse scores compared to satisfied SMVs, and dissatisfied IPs reported worse scores compared to satisfied IPs. Satisfied and dissatisfied SMVs and IPs in the mixed relationship satisfaction groups reported little to no differences across measures compared to their respective SMVs and IPs in the Both Satisfied and Both Dissatisfied groups, with the exception of the family measures for dissatisfied SMVs or IPs.

Conclusions: Relationship dissatisfaction was related to worse health and family outcomes, even when the other members of the dyad reported satisfaction in their relationship. A dual-goal, dyadic approach to TBI treatment that focuses on how individual, couple, and family factors interact will likely maximize service member recovery and return to duty, as well as outcomes for military families.

一种理解军人夫妇在服役人员和退伍军人创伤性脑损伤后关系满意度和健康结果的二元方法。
目的:本研究采用二元方法,在关系满意度的背景下,对服役人员和退伍军人(SMV)创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后军人夫妇的健康和家庭结果进行了研究。方法:参与者包括164对(N = 328),由美国smv (N = 164)和他们的亲密伴侣(ip, N = 164)组成。夫妻完成了一项关系满意度测量,以及心理、社会、护理、家庭、神经行为和/或创伤后应激障碍结果的测量。将夫妻关系满意度分为四组:(1)SMV和IP满意组(均满意,n = 72对),(2)SMV满意和IP不满意组(SMVsat/IPdis, n = 25对),(3)SMV不满意和IP满意组(SMVdis/IPsat, n = 21对),(4)SMV和IP不满意组(均不满意,n = 46对)。结果:在两组中,smv报告的得分低于他们的ip,除了在SMVsat/IPdis组中,他们不满意的ip报告的四项指标得分较差。在各个群体中,不满意的smv报告的得分比满意的smv低,不满意的ip报告的得分比满意的ip低。除了不满意的smv或ip的家庭测量外,混合关系满意度组中满意和不满意的smv和ip相比,他们各自的smv和ip几乎没有差异。结论:关系不满意与更糟糕的健康和家庭结果有关,即使其他成员对他们的关系表示满意。创伤性脑损伤治疗的双目标、二元方法侧重于个人、夫妻和家庭因素如何相互作用,这可能会最大限度地提高服役人员的康复和重返工作岗位,以及对军人家庭的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信