Perspective improvement of regional air pollution burden of disease estimation by machine intelligence.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436838
Cheng-Pin Kuo, Joshua S Fu, Yang Liu
{"title":"Perspective improvement of regional air pollution burden of disease estimation by machine intelligence.","authors":"Cheng-Pin Kuo, Joshua S Fu, Yang Liu","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As air pollution events increasingly threaten public health under climate change, more precise estimations of air pollutant exposure and the burden of diseases (BD) are urgently needed. However, current BD assessments from various sources of air pollutant concentrations and exposure risks, and the derived uncertainty still needs systematic assessment. Owing to growing health and air quality data availability, machine learning (ML) may provide a promising solution. This study proposed an ML-measurement-model fusion (MMF) framework that can quantify the air pollutant biases from the Chemical Transport Modeling (CTM) inputs, and further analyze the BD biases concerning various sources of air pollutant estimations and exposure risks. In our study region, the proposed ML-MMF framework successfully improves CTM-modeled PM<sub>2.5</sub> (from R<sup>2</sup> = 0.41 to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86) and O<sub>3</sub> (from R<sup>2</sup> = 0.48 to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82). The bias quantification results showed that premature deaths in the study region are mainly biased by boundary conditions (Improvement Ratio, IR = 99%) and meteorology (91%), compared with emission and land-use data. The results of further analysis showed using observations only (PM<sub>2.5</sub>: 17%; O<sub>3</sub>: 56%) or the uncorrected CTM estimations (PM<sub>2.5</sub>: -18%; O<sub>3</sub>: 171%) contributed more BD biases compared with employing averaged risks without considering urbanization levels (PM<sub>2.5</sub>: -5%; O<sub>3</sub>: -4%). In conclusion, employing observations only, uncorrected CTM estimations, and homogeneous risks may contribute to non-negligible BD biases and affect regional air quality and risk management. To cope with increasing needs of finer-scale air quality management under climate change, our developed ML-MMF framework can provide a quantitative reference to improve CTM performance and priority to improve input data quality and CTM mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1436838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As air pollution events increasingly threaten public health under climate change, more precise estimations of air pollutant exposure and the burden of diseases (BD) are urgently needed. However, current BD assessments from various sources of air pollutant concentrations and exposure risks, and the derived uncertainty still needs systematic assessment. Owing to growing health and air quality data availability, machine learning (ML) may provide a promising solution. This study proposed an ML-measurement-model fusion (MMF) framework that can quantify the air pollutant biases from the Chemical Transport Modeling (CTM) inputs, and further analyze the BD biases concerning various sources of air pollutant estimations and exposure risks. In our study region, the proposed ML-MMF framework successfully improves CTM-modeled PM2.5 (from R2 = 0.41 to R2 = 0.86) and O3 (from R2 = 0.48 to R2 = 0.82). The bias quantification results showed that premature deaths in the study region are mainly biased by boundary conditions (Improvement Ratio, IR = 99%) and meteorology (91%), compared with emission and land-use data. The results of further analysis showed using observations only (PM2.5: 17%; O3: 56%) or the uncorrected CTM estimations (PM2.5: -18%; O3: 171%) contributed more BD biases compared with employing averaged risks without considering urbanization levels (PM2.5: -5%; O3: -4%). In conclusion, employing observations only, uncorrected CTM estimations, and homogeneous risks may contribute to non-negligible BD biases and affect regional air quality and risk management. To cope with increasing needs of finer-scale air quality management under climate change, our developed ML-MMF framework can provide a quantitative reference to improve CTM performance and priority to improve input data quality and CTM mechanisms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信