Prevalence and clinical implications of unexpected red blood cell antibodies in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.

Q4 Medicine
Immunohematology Pub Date : 2025-03-26 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2025-003
Trileeshiya I Withanawasam, Nashma Sainudeen
{"title":"Prevalence and clinical implications of unexpected red blood cell antibodies in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.","authors":"Trileeshiya I Withanawasam, Nashma Sainudeen","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2025-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unexpected red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies can lead to hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Screening for these antibodies is essential to ensure transfusion safety and improve patient care. Prevalence and frequency of unexpected antibodies vary among populations, influenced by genetic and demographic factors. This study addresses the gap in data specific to University Hospital, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University. A retrospective analysis was performed on 20,212 patients (40.74% pregnant women and 59.25% transfusion recipients) from November 2019 to August 2024, assessing the prevalence, distribution, and clinical relevance of RBC alloantibodies. The study found that 0.80 percent of patients were alloimmunized and 28.87 percent of the antibodies were clinically significant. Common antibodies included anti-Le<sup>b</sup> (27.27%) and anti-Lea (19.25%); anti-D was the most frequent among Rh antibodies. A significantly higher proportion of pregnant women were alloimmunized compared with transfusion recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.000). Among D- pregnant women, 5.45 percent were alloimmunized, mainly with anti-D. HDFN was identified with either maternal anti-D or anti-E. These findings emphasize the need for early antibody detection and monitoring to enhance transfusion safety, suggesting policy improvements for antibody screening in transfusion and antenatal care in Sri Lanka.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"41 1","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2025-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unexpected red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies can lead to hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Screening for these antibodies is essential to ensure transfusion safety and improve patient care. Prevalence and frequency of unexpected antibodies vary among populations, influenced by genetic and demographic factors. This study addresses the gap in data specific to University Hospital, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University. A retrospective analysis was performed on 20,212 patients (40.74% pregnant women and 59.25% transfusion recipients) from November 2019 to August 2024, assessing the prevalence, distribution, and clinical relevance of RBC alloantibodies. The study found that 0.80 percent of patients were alloimmunized and 28.87 percent of the antibodies were clinically significant. Common antibodies included anti-Leb (27.27%) and anti-Lea (19.25%); anti-D was the most frequent among Rh antibodies. A significantly higher proportion of pregnant women were alloimmunized compared with transfusion recipients (p < 0.000). Among D- pregnant women, 5.45 percent were alloimmunized, mainly with anti-D. HDFN was identified with either maternal anti-D or anti-E. These findings emphasize the need for early antibody detection and monitoring to enhance transfusion safety, suggesting policy improvements for antibody screening in transfusion and antenatal care in Sri Lanka.

斯里兰卡一家三级保健医院意外红细胞抗体的流行和临床意义
意外的红细胞(RBC)异体抗体可导致溶血性输血反应和胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病(hddn)。筛查这些抗体对于确保输血安全和改善患者护理至关重要。受遗传和人口因素的影响,人群中意外抗体的患病率和频率各不相同。这项研究解决了约翰·科特拉瓦拉国防大学大学医院的具体数据差距。回顾性分析2019年11月至2024年8月20212例患者(40.74%孕妇和59.25%输血接受者),评估红细胞同种异体抗体的流行、分布和临床相关性。研究发现,0.80%的患者进行了同种异体免疫,28.87%的抗体具有临床意义。常见抗体有抗leb(27.27%)和抗lea (19.25%);Rh抗体中以抗d抗体最为常见。与输血接受者相比,接受同种异体免疫的孕妇比例明显更高(p < 0.000)。在D型孕妇中,5.45%的人进行了同种免疫,主要是抗D。hdn与母体抗d或抗e均有关联。这些发现强调了早期抗体检测和监测的必要性,以加强输血安全,建议改进斯里兰卡输血和产前保健中的抗体筛查政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信