Echocardiography screening of German military pilot applicants as an example for high-hazard occupations.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436805
Norbert Guettler, Stefan Sammito
{"title":"Echocardiography screening of German military pilot applicants as an example for high-hazard occupations.","authors":"Norbert Guettler, Stefan Sammito","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-employment screening is of utmost importance in high-risk occupations for the early diagnosis and prevention of cardiac and non-cardiac disease, and for risk mitigation. Recommendations for echocardiography screening, however, are contradictory. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively analyze echocardiography data from German military pilot applicant screening to find out in how many cases cardiac disease was diagnosed, and how often the diagnosis influenced aeromedical decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6,110 screening echocardiographies from German military pilot applicants, 5,923 were male, examined between January 2007 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for findings and their impact on aeromedical decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a 14.5-year period, 4,477 out of 6,110 screening echocardiograms were normal. The remaining 1,633 applicants revealed a total of 1,962 abnormalities, mainly consisting of minor tricuspid and mitral valve regurgitations (81.9%). Due to echocardiography findings, 80 applicants (1.3%) were unfit for flying duties, 9 (0.1%) were fit with limitations, and 1,544 (25.3%) were fit with findings that had to be monitored over time, but which were not aeromedically relevant. The most common diagnoses leading to disqualification or limitations were bicuspid aortic valve with or without aortic regurgitation (84.9%) and mitral valve prolapse with or without regurgitation (9.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percentages of abnormal findings were similar to other studies. Aeromedical assessments based on those findings, however, were slightly different, as they depend on national employment policies. As a consequence, the usefulness of echocardiography may vary between different countries and different professions, depending on the acceptance of certain findings for employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1436805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pre-employment screening is of utmost importance in high-risk occupations for the early diagnosis and prevention of cardiac and non-cardiac disease, and for risk mitigation. Recommendations for echocardiography screening, however, are contradictory. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively analyze echocardiography data from German military pilot applicant screening to find out in how many cases cardiac disease was diagnosed, and how often the diagnosis influenced aeromedical decision making.

Methods: 6,110 screening echocardiographies from German military pilot applicants, 5,923 were male, examined between January 2007 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for findings and their impact on aeromedical decisions.

Results: During a 14.5-year period, 4,477 out of 6,110 screening echocardiograms were normal. The remaining 1,633 applicants revealed a total of 1,962 abnormalities, mainly consisting of minor tricuspid and mitral valve regurgitations (81.9%). Due to echocardiography findings, 80 applicants (1.3%) were unfit for flying duties, 9 (0.1%) were fit with limitations, and 1,544 (25.3%) were fit with findings that had to be monitored over time, but which were not aeromedically relevant. The most common diagnoses leading to disqualification or limitations were bicuspid aortic valve with or without aortic regurgitation (84.9%) and mitral valve prolapse with or without regurgitation (9.3%).

Conclusion: Percentages of abnormal findings were similar to other studies. Aeromedical assessments based on those findings, however, were slightly different, as they depend on national employment policies. As a consequence, the usefulness of echocardiography may vary between different countries and different professions, depending on the acceptance of certain findings for employment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信