Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Sarah Parnell, Ryan S Aultman, Ta'Quoris A Newsome, Sydney H Swafford, Abby T Compton, Rhett C Schimpf, Sophia N Schmidt, Carstell Lee, Austin J Graybeal
{"title":"Peripheral vasoconstriction is not elevated during hyperreactive responses to the cold pressor test: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Sarah Parnell, Ryan S Aultman, Ta'Quoris A Newsome, Sydney H Swafford, Abby T Compton, Rhett C Schimpf, Sophia N Schmidt, Carstell Lee, Austin J Graybeal","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals demonstrating increases in systolic systolic blood pressure or diastolic diastolic blood pressure blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg are considered hyperreactors to the cold pressor test (CPT). However, it remains unclear if peripheral vasoconstriction is similarly exaggerated during the CPT in these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five individuals (54.5% non-White, 67.3% female) performed a single-visit study including a 2-min CPT of the foot, a 2-min bout of rhythmic handgrip exercise ([HG] 25% maximal voluntary contraction), and a 2-min combined trial (CPT + HG). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and forearm blood flow (FBF) were continuously recorded, and vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean arterial pressure (MAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyperreactors (<i>n</i> = 21) demonstrated exaggerated increases in blood pressure and rate pressure product during the CPT compared to normoreactors (<i>n</i> = 34; all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed for ΔFBF (<i>f</i> = 1.33, <i>p</i> = 0.259) or ΔFVC responses (<i>f</i> = 2.10, <i>p</i> = 0.083). Results also indicated a blunted increase in ΔMAP during the CPT + HG trial compared to the CPT only trial in hyperreactors (<i>f</i> = 6.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which was not observed in normoreactors (<i>f</i> = 0.982, <i>p</i> = 0.420), and a blunted ΔFVC response during the CPT + HG trial in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (<i>f</i> = 2.57, <i>p</i> = 0.039). When analyzed separately, the blood pressure responses to HG exercise were also significantly exaggerated in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while ΔFBF and ΔFVC responses were not (both <i>p</i> ≥ 0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT are not accompanied by increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Moreover, handgrip exercise attenuates hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1532992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individuals demonstrating increases in systolic systolic blood pressure or diastolic diastolic blood pressure blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg are considered hyperreactors to the cold pressor test (CPT). However, it remains unclear if peripheral vasoconstriction is similarly exaggerated during the CPT in these individuals.
Methods: Fifty-five individuals (54.5% non-White, 67.3% female) performed a single-visit study including a 2-min CPT of the foot, a 2-min bout of rhythmic handgrip exercise ([HG] 25% maximal voluntary contraction), and a 2-min combined trial (CPT + HG). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and forearm blood flow (FBF) were continuously recorded, and vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean arterial pressure (MAP).
Results: Hyperreactors (n = 21) demonstrated exaggerated increases in blood pressure and rate pressure product during the CPT compared to normoreactors (n = 34; all p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed for ΔFBF (f = 1.33, p = 0.259) or ΔFVC responses (f = 2.10, p = 0.083). Results also indicated a blunted increase in ΔMAP during the CPT + HG trial compared to the CPT only trial in hyperreactors (f = 6.95, p < 0.001), which was not observed in normoreactors (f = 0.982, p = 0.420), and a blunted ΔFVC response during the CPT + HG trial in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (f = 2.57, p = 0.039). When analyzed separately, the blood pressure responses to HG exercise were also significantly exaggerated in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (all p < 0.001), while ΔFBF and ΔFVC responses were not (both p ≥ 0.701).
Conclusion: These findings indicate that hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT are not accompanied by increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Moreover, handgrip exercise attenuates hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.