Peripheral vasoconstriction is not elevated during hyperreactive responses to the cold pressor test: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992
Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Sarah Parnell, Ryan S Aultman, Ta'Quoris A Newsome, Sydney H Swafford, Abby T Compton, Rhett C Schimpf, Sophia N Schmidt, Carstell Lee, Austin J Graybeal
{"title":"Peripheral vasoconstriction is not elevated during hyperreactive responses to the cold pressor test: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Sarah Parnell, Ryan S Aultman, Ta'Quoris A Newsome, Sydney H Swafford, Abby T Compton, Rhett C Schimpf, Sophia N Schmidt, Carstell Lee, Austin J Graybeal","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals demonstrating increases in systolic systolic blood pressure or diastolic diastolic blood pressure blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg are considered hyperreactors to the cold pressor test (CPT). However, it remains unclear if peripheral vasoconstriction is similarly exaggerated during the CPT in these individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five individuals (54.5% non-White, 67.3% female) performed a single-visit study including a 2-min CPT of the foot, a 2-min bout of rhythmic handgrip exercise ([HG] 25% maximal voluntary contraction), and a 2-min combined trial (CPT + HG). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and forearm blood flow (FBF) were continuously recorded, and vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean arterial pressure (MAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyperreactors (<i>n</i> = 21) demonstrated exaggerated increases in blood pressure and rate pressure product during the CPT compared to normoreactors (<i>n</i> = 34; all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed for ΔFBF (<i>f</i> = 1.33, <i>p</i> = 0.259) or ΔFVC responses (<i>f</i> = 2.10, <i>p</i> = 0.083). Results also indicated a blunted increase in ΔMAP during the CPT + HG trial compared to the CPT only trial in hyperreactors (<i>f</i> = 6.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001), which was not observed in normoreactors (<i>f</i> = 0.982, <i>p</i> = 0.420), and a blunted ΔFVC response during the CPT + HG trial in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (<i>f</i> = 2.57, <i>p</i> = 0.039). When analyzed separately, the blood pressure responses to HG exercise were also significantly exaggerated in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while ΔFBF and ΔFVC responses were not (both <i>p</i> ≥ 0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT are not accompanied by increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Moreover, handgrip exercise attenuates hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1532992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1532992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals demonstrating increases in systolic systolic blood pressure or diastolic diastolic blood pressure blood pressure of at least 15 mmHg are considered hyperreactors to the cold pressor test (CPT). However, it remains unclear if peripheral vasoconstriction is similarly exaggerated during the CPT in these individuals.

Methods: Fifty-five individuals (54.5% non-White, 67.3% female) performed a single-visit study including a 2-min CPT of the foot, a 2-min bout of rhythmic handgrip exercise ([HG] 25% maximal voluntary contraction), and a 2-min combined trial (CPT + HG). Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and forearm blood flow (FBF) were continuously recorded, and vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean arterial pressure (MAP).

Results: Hyperreactors (n = 21) demonstrated exaggerated increases in blood pressure and rate pressure product during the CPT compared to normoreactors (n = 34; all p < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed for ΔFBF (f = 1.33, p = 0.259) or ΔFVC responses (f = 2.10, p = 0.083). Results also indicated a blunted increase in ΔMAP during the CPT + HG trial compared to the CPT only trial in hyperreactors (f = 6.95, p < 0.001), which was not observed in normoreactors (f = 0.982, p = 0.420), and a blunted ΔFVC response during the CPT + HG trial in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (f = 2.57, p = 0.039). When analyzed separately, the blood pressure responses to HG exercise were also significantly exaggerated in hyperreactors compared to normoreactors (all p < 0.001), while ΔFBF and ΔFVC responses were not (both p ≥ 0.701).

Conclusion: These findings indicate that hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT are not accompanied by increased peripheral vasoconstriction. Moreover, handgrip exercise attenuates hyperreactive blood pressure responses to the CPT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信