Assessing Public Awareness and Understanding of Dysphagia: A Representative Survey of US Adults.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sonja M Molfenter, R Brynn Jones-Rastelli, Arie Barfield, Drew Cooks, Claire Crossman, Kaiyn Jackson, D'manda Price, Journee C Robinson, Aaron M Johnson
{"title":"Assessing Public Awareness and Understanding of Dysphagia: A Representative Survey of US Adults.","authors":"Sonja M Molfenter, R Brynn Jones-Rastelli, Arie Barfield, Drew Cooks, Claire Crossman, Kaiyn Jackson, D'manda Price, Journee C Robinson, Aaron M Johnson","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10826-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dysphagia is a commonly occurring medical condition estimated to occur in between and 10% adults in the US. Despite this relatively high prevalence, the general population's understanding of this condition is currently unknown. Our aims were to (a) conduct a large-scale survey to determine the public's awareness and understanding of dysphagia in comparison to other three other health conditions and (b) compare this knowledge to relative prevalence rates of the conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was designed to measure four constructs of interest comparing dysphagia with insomnia, vertigo and ataxia. Constructs included: (1) Knowledge of the Condition, (2) Source of Knowledge, (3) Health Impact, (4) Treating Medical Professionals. The survey was launched via Qualtrics™ software and participants were recruited and paid using Prolific™. Descriptive statistics were used to compare participants knowledge of dysphagia with the other conditions. To obtain relative prevalence rates, Cosmos was used to quantify the number of Epic-based patient encounters with any ICD-10 code for each condition in 2023 and expressed as a percent of all patient encounters in the US in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2000 adults (n = 1030 female) aged 18-95 (median 49, IQR = 33-62) completed our survey. When asked, 'Do you know what ____ is'? participants expressed higher familiarity with insomnia (99%) and vertigo (87%) in comparison to dysphagia (25%) and ataxia (18%). From a list of 8 options, 99% and 94% participants selected the correct impairment for insomnia and vertigo respectively, compared with 44% correct for dysphagia and 22% for ataxia. Participants selected an appropriate healthcare provider for dysphagia 47% of the time compared with 74% for insomnia, 56% for vertigo and 36% for ataxia. When asked to identify up to 3 sequelae (from a list of 9), only 4% of participants were able to correctly identify all three for dysphagia, in comparison to 16% for ataxia, 27% for vertigo and 60% for insomnia. The Cosmos analysis revealed that while insomnia had the highest prevalence in 2023 (5.5% of patient encounters), dysphagia occurred much more frequently (2.4%) than vertigo (0.68%) and ataxia (0.24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These discrepancies highlight a notable gap in public awareness between dysphagia and more recognized conditions of insomnia and vertigo, even though the prevalence of dysphagia is higher than vertigo. Increasing public awareness of dysphagia is vital for early intervention, increasing quality of life, and advocating for equitable access to healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10826-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Dysphagia is a commonly occurring medical condition estimated to occur in between and 10% adults in the US. Despite this relatively high prevalence, the general population's understanding of this condition is currently unknown. Our aims were to (a) conduct a large-scale survey to determine the public's awareness and understanding of dysphagia in comparison to other three other health conditions and (b) compare this knowledge to relative prevalence rates of the conditions.

Methods: The survey was designed to measure four constructs of interest comparing dysphagia with insomnia, vertigo and ataxia. Constructs included: (1) Knowledge of the Condition, (2) Source of Knowledge, (3) Health Impact, (4) Treating Medical Professionals. The survey was launched via Qualtrics™ software and participants were recruited and paid using Prolific™. Descriptive statistics were used to compare participants knowledge of dysphagia with the other conditions. To obtain relative prevalence rates, Cosmos was used to quantify the number of Epic-based patient encounters with any ICD-10 code for each condition in 2023 and expressed as a percent of all patient encounters in the US in 2023.

Results: 2000 adults (n = 1030 female) aged 18-95 (median 49, IQR = 33-62) completed our survey. When asked, 'Do you know what ____ is'? participants expressed higher familiarity with insomnia (99%) and vertigo (87%) in comparison to dysphagia (25%) and ataxia (18%). From a list of 8 options, 99% and 94% participants selected the correct impairment for insomnia and vertigo respectively, compared with 44% correct for dysphagia and 22% for ataxia. Participants selected an appropriate healthcare provider for dysphagia 47% of the time compared with 74% for insomnia, 56% for vertigo and 36% for ataxia. When asked to identify up to 3 sequelae (from a list of 9), only 4% of participants were able to correctly identify all three for dysphagia, in comparison to 16% for ataxia, 27% for vertigo and 60% for insomnia. The Cosmos analysis revealed that while insomnia had the highest prevalence in 2023 (5.5% of patient encounters), dysphagia occurred much more frequently (2.4%) than vertigo (0.68%) and ataxia (0.24%).

Conclusions: These discrepancies highlight a notable gap in public awareness between dysphagia and more recognized conditions of insomnia and vertigo, even though the prevalence of dysphagia is higher than vertigo. Increasing public awareness of dysphagia is vital for early intervention, increasing quality of life, and advocating for equitable access to healthcare resources.

评估公众对吞咽困难的认识和理解:一项对美国成年人的代表性调查。
目的:吞咽困难是一种常见的医疗状况,估计发生在美国10%的成年人之间。尽管患病率相对较高,但一般人群对这种情况的了解目前尚不清楚。我们的目的是:(a)进行一次大规模调查,以确定公众对吞咽困难的认识和理解,并将其与其他三种健康状况进行比较;(b)将这种知识与这些状况的相对患病率进行比较。方法:采用四个感兴趣构念对吞咽困难与失眠、眩晕和共济失调进行比较。构念包括:(1)疾病知识,(2)知识来源,(3)健康影响,(4)治疗医疗专业人员。该调查是通过Qualtrics™软件发起的,参与者是通过高产软件招募和付费的。描述性统计用于比较参与者对吞咽困难与其他情况的了解。为了获得相对患病率,Cosmos用于量化2023年每种疾病的ICD-10代码中基于epic的患者就诊数量,并表示为2023年美国所有患者就诊的百分比。结果:2000名成年人(n = 1030名女性)完成了我们的调查,年龄在18-95岁之间(中位数49,IQR = 33-62)。当被问到“你知道____是什么吗?”参与者对失眠(99%)和眩晕(87%)的熟悉程度高于吞咽困难(25%)和共济失调(18%)。从8个选项中,99%和94%的参与者分别选择了失眠和眩晕的正确损害,相比之下,44%的人选择了吞咽困难,22%的人选择了共济失调。参与者选择合适的医疗服务提供者治疗吞咽困难的比例为47%,失眠为74%,眩晕为56%,共济失调为36%。当被要求识别多达3个后遗症(从9个列表中)时,只有4%的参与者能够正确识别所有三个吞咽困难,相比之下,16%的人能够识别共济失调,27%的人能够识别眩晕,60%的人能够识别失眠。Cosmos的分析显示,尽管失眠在2023年的患病率最高(占患者总数的5.5%),但吞咽困难的发生率(2.4%)远高于眩晕(0.68%)和共济失调(0.24%)。结论:这些差异表明,尽管吞咽困难的患病率高于眩晕,但公众对吞咽困难与更广为人知的失眠和眩晕的认识存在显著差距。提高公众对吞咽困难的认识对于早期干预、提高生活质量和倡导公平获得医疗资源至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信