Effectiveness of Laser-activated Irrigation Modalities on Intracanal Bacterial Elimination and Apical Extrusion.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohamed Marwan Abbas, Sunaina Shetty Yadadi, Ashna Sulaiman, Okba Mahmoud, Ahmed Jamleh, Saaid Al Shehadat
{"title":"Effectiveness of Laser-activated Irrigation Modalities on Intracanal Bacterial Elimination and Apical Extrusion.","authors":"Mohamed Marwan Abbas, Sunaina Shetty Yadadi, Ashna Sulaiman, Okba Mahmoud, Ahmed Jamleh, Saaid Al Shehadat","doi":"10.14744/eej.2024.36450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) and diode laser with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in activating intracanal irrigants for bacterial elimination from the root canal and apical extrusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty extracted single-canal human teeth were chemo-mechanically prepared and placed in 3 ml glass vials with sterile 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. The root canals were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The samples were divided into three experimental groups (PIPS, diode laser, and PUI) and a control group (n=15 each). The experimental groups had root canals filled with saline and activated according to the manufacturer's instructions, while the control group received saline without activation. Bacterial samples were collected from the canals and outside the apex for quantification, cultured on nutrient agar for 24 hours at 37°C, and counted as colony-forming units. Mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests at 5 % significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All activation protocols significantly eliminated intracanal E. faecalis compared to the negative control group (p<0.05). PUI and the diode lasers were significantly more effective than PIPS (p<0.05). Extruded bacteria were higher in PUI than in PIPS and diode lasers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, the tested techniques extruded bacteria and did not completely eliminate intracanal bacteria. The diode laser showed the best bacterial elimination and extrusion outcome. (EEJ-2024-07-112).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2024.36450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) and diode laser with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in activating intracanal irrigants for bacterial elimination from the root canal and apical extrusion.

Methods: Sixty extracted single-canal human teeth were chemo-mechanically prepared and placed in 3 ml glass vials with sterile 0.9 % sodium chloride solution. The root canals were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The samples were divided into three experimental groups (PIPS, diode laser, and PUI) and a control group (n=15 each). The experimental groups had root canals filled with saline and activated according to the manufacturer's instructions, while the control group received saline without activation. Bacterial samples were collected from the canals and outside the apex for quantification, cultured on nutrient agar for 24 hours at 37°C, and counted as colony-forming units. Mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests at 5 % significance.

Results: All activation protocols significantly eliminated intracanal E. faecalis compared to the negative control group (p<0.05). PUI and the diode lasers were significantly more effective than PIPS (p<0.05). Extruded bacteria were higher in PUI than in PIPS and diode lasers.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the tested techniques extruded bacteria and did not completely eliminate intracanal bacteria. The diode laser showed the best bacterial elimination and extrusion outcome. (EEJ-2024-07-112).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信