Effect of Various Disinfection Protocols on Endodontic Biofilm and Growth Factors Release from Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Abhilasha Gugliani, Sonali Taneja, Devi Charan Shetty, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla
{"title":"Effect of Various Disinfection Protocols on Endodontic Biofilm and Growth Factors Release from Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Abhilasha Gugliani, Sonali Taneja, Devi Charan Shetty, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla","doi":"10.14744/eej.2024.84856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of various disinfection protocols on bacterial biofilm and subsequent release of growth factors from radicular dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety two extracted single rooted premolars were obtained and contaminated with E. faecalis biofilm for 21 days. The samples were then divided into three main groups - Group I: Irrigation (I) only, Group II: Calcium hydroxide (CH) placement followed by final irrigation and Group III: Triple Antibiotic paste (TAP) placement followed by final irrigation. Each group was further then divided into four sub-groups according to the final irrigating solution used - Sub group A: Saline, Sub group B: 17% EDTA, Sub group C: 1% phytic acid and Sub group D: 0.2%. chitosan nanoparticles. After treatment, the samples were subjected to colony-forming unit (CFU) analysis to determine bacterial reduction and the release of TGF-β1 and VEGF from the root canals, which was quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The data were analyzed using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum reduction in E. faecalis biofilm was observed in Group III (TAP), followed by Group II (CH), and finally Group I (irrigation only). Among the subgroups, the maximum reduction in bacterial biofilm was seen with chitosan nanoparticles, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. After 24 hours, the highest release of both TGF-β1 and VEGF was observed in the chitosan nanoparticles subgroup, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. Similar results were seen in the CH and TAP groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that newer irrigating solutions, particularly 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles, showed superior antibacterial activity and better smear layer removal, leading to greater growth factor release from the radicular dentin. The study also highlighted that TAP placement resulted in maximum bacterial reduction, regardless of the final irrigant used. Furthermore, the release of TGF-β1 was significantly higher than VEGF in all groups. (EEJ-2024-03-045).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2024.84856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of various disinfection protocols on bacterial biofilm and subsequent release of growth factors from radicular dentin.

Methods: One hundred and ninety two extracted single rooted premolars were obtained and contaminated with E. faecalis biofilm for 21 days. The samples were then divided into three main groups - Group I: Irrigation (I) only, Group II: Calcium hydroxide (CH) placement followed by final irrigation and Group III: Triple Antibiotic paste (TAP) placement followed by final irrigation. Each group was further then divided into four sub-groups according to the final irrigating solution used - Sub group A: Saline, Sub group B: 17% EDTA, Sub group C: 1% phytic acid and Sub group D: 0.2%. chitosan nanoparticles. After treatment, the samples were subjected to colony-forming unit (CFU) analysis to determine bacterial reduction and the release of TGF-β1 and VEGF from the root canals, which was quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The data were analyzed using statistical tests.

Results: The maximum reduction in E. faecalis biofilm was observed in Group III (TAP), followed by Group II (CH), and finally Group I (irrigation only). Among the subgroups, the maximum reduction in bacterial biofilm was seen with chitosan nanoparticles, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. After 24 hours, the highest release of both TGF-β1 and VEGF was observed in the chitosan nanoparticles subgroup, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. Similar results were seen in the CH and TAP groups.

Conclusion: The study concluded that newer irrigating solutions, particularly 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles, showed superior antibacterial activity and better smear layer removal, leading to greater growth factor release from the radicular dentin. The study also highlighted that TAP placement resulted in maximum bacterial reduction, regardless of the final irrigant used. Furthermore, the release of TGF-β1 was significantly higher than VEGF in all groups. (EEJ-2024-03-045).

不同消毒方案对根状牙本质生物膜和生长因子释放的影响:体外研究。
目的:评价和比较不同消毒方案对根状牙本质细菌生物膜及随后生长因子释放的影响。方法:提取单根前磨牙192颗,用粪肠球菌生物膜污染21 d。然后将样品分为三组:第一组:仅冲洗(I),第二组:氢氧化钙(CH)放置,最后冲洗,第三组:三抗生素膏体(TAP)放置,最后冲洗。各组再根据最终使用的冲洗液分为4个亚组:A亚组:生理盐水,B亚组:17% EDTA, C亚组:1%植酸,D亚组:0.2%。壳聚糖纳米粒子。处理后,对样品进行菌落形成单位(CFU)分析,以测定细菌的减少以及根管中TGF-β1和VEGF的释放,并使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)进行定量。使用统计检验对数据进行分析。结果:粪肠球菌生物膜的减少以ⅲ组(TAP)最大,其次为ⅱ组(CH),最后为ⅰ组(仅灌洗)。在亚组中,壳聚糖纳米颗粒最大限度地减少了细菌生物膜,其次是植酸、EDTA和生理盐水。24小时后,壳聚糖纳米颗粒亚组中TGF-β1和VEGF的释放最高,其次是植酸、EDTA和生理盐水。在CH组和TAP组中也看到了类似的结果。结论:更新的冲洗液,特别是0.2%的壳聚糖纳米颗粒,具有更好的抗菌活性和更好的去除涂抹层,导致根状牙本质释放更多的生长因子。该研究还强调,无论最终使用哪种灌溉方式,TAP的放置都能最大限度地减少细菌。各组TGF-β1的释放量均显著高于VEGF。(eej - 2024 - 03 - 045)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信