Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jocelyn Joy Chan, Magnus Chan, James M Wright
{"title":"Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.","authors":"Jocelyn Joy Chan, Magnus Chan, James M Wright","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD007895.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants are commonly taken daily over long periods of time to relieve sinus and nasal congestion. The mechanism of action of decongestants potentially increases blood pressure, and these effects may be acute or chronic. However, no systematic reviews to date have comprehensively assessed the chronic blood pressure effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants as a drug class, despite their widespread non-prescription availability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary objective To assess the effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo. Secondary objective To assess the effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) up to July 2024: Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Cochrane Register of Studies, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no language, publication year, or publication status restrictions.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included RCTs of at least seven days' duration with parallel groups (intervention and placebo) comparing adrenergic agonist oral decongestants versus placebo on blood pressure in people aged over six years.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors (JJC and MC) independently assessed the trials for inclusion, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias from the included trials. In cases where there were disagreements, the third review author (JMW) adjudicated. For any missing or unclear information in the studies, we contacted the study author to request the missing information or seek clarification. The primary outcomes were systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes were heart rate and withdrawal due to adverse effects. We used a fixed-effect model to combine the effect sizes from all studies. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Five RCTs randomizing 882 participants met the inclusion criteria. The shortest study duration was one week, and the longest study duration was 24 weeks. These studies measured blood pressure and heart rate after one to seven weeks of taking oral decongestants. The largest study included 568 people, and the smallest study included 18 people. The mean age of participants was 20.0 years, with 326 males and 591 females. The studies were conducted in the USA and Europe; most were set in the USA. Pharmaceutical companies funded three of the five included studies. The findings are relevant to all people using adrenergic agonist oral decongestants for seven days or longer regardless of comorbidities or pre-existing conditions. The adrenergic agonist oral decongestants included were ephedrine (one RCT), pseudoephedrine (one RCT), and phenylpropanolamine (three RCTs). Compared to placebo, adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on systolic blood pressure, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] 0.91 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.57 to 2.38; 4 RCTs, 784 participants; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%; very low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on diastolic blood pressure (MD 0.44 mmHg, 95% CI -0.59 to 1.48; 5 RCTs, 882 participants; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%; low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on heart rate, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 1.92 beats per minute, 95% CI -0.62 to 4.47; 2 RCTs, 190 participants; I<sup>2</sup> = 79%; very low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on the number of withdrawals due to adverse effects (risk ratio [RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.88; 4 RCTs, 806 participants; low-certainty evidence; note 1 study reported withdrawals due to adverse effects but recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 3 studies rather than 4). Four studies were at overall high risk of bias, and one study was at overall low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review, chronic daily intake of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants had little to no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, and withdrawals due to adverse effects. People making decisions about using these medicines should consider the very low certainty of evidence and the theoretical risk of increased blood pressure. Independent trials free from biases that are designed to answer this question are required. The evidence was limited due to the small number of studies, and the blood pressure and heart rate not being measured at the optimal time after drug ingestion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"3 ","pages":"CD007895"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007895.pub3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants are commonly taken daily over long periods of time to relieve sinus and nasal congestion. The mechanism of action of decongestants potentially increases blood pressure, and these effects may be acute or chronic. However, no systematic reviews to date have comprehensively assessed the chronic blood pressure effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants as a drug class, despite their widespread non-prescription availability.

Objectives: Primary objective To assess the effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to placebo. Secondary objective To assess the effects of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects.

Search methods: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) up to July 2024: Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Cochrane Register of Studies, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no language, publication year, or publication status restrictions.

Selection criteria: We included RCTs of at least seven days' duration with parallel groups (intervention and placebo) comparing adrenergic agonist oral decongestants versus placebo on blood pressure in people aged over six years.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors (JJC and MC) independently assessed the trials for inclusion, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias from the included trials. In cases where there were disagreements, the third review author (JMW) adjudicated. For any missing or unclear information in the studies, we contacted the study author to request the missing information or seek clarification. The primary outcomes were systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes were heart rate and withdrawal due to adverse effects. We used a fixed-effect model to combine the effect sizes from all studies. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

Main results: Five RCTs randomizing 882 participants met the inclusion criteria. The shortest study duration was one week, and the longest study duration was 24 weeks. These studies measured blood pressure and heart rate after one to seven weeks of taking oral decongestants. The largest study included 568 people, and the smallest study included 18 people. The mean age of participants was 20.0 years, with 326 males and 591 females. The studies were conducted in the USA and Europe; most were set in the USA. Pharmaceutical companies funded three of the five included studies. The findings are relevant to all people using adrenergic agonist oral decongestants for seven days or longer regardless of comorbidities or pre-existing conditions. The adrenergic agonist oral decongestants included were ephedrine (one RCT), pseudoephedrine (one RCT), and phenylpropanolamine (three RCTs). Compared to placebo, adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on systolic blood pressure, but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] 0.91 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.57 to 2.38; 4 RCTs, 784 participants; I2 = 54%; very low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on diastolic blood pressure (MD 0.44 mmHg, 95% CI -0.59 to 1.48; 5 RCTs, 882 participants; I2 = 30%; low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on heart rate, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 1.92 beats per minute, 95% CI -0.62 to 4.47; 2 RCTs, 190 participants; I2 = 79%; very low-certainty evidence). Adrenergic agonist oral decongestants may have little to no effect on the number of withdrawals due to adverse effects (risk ratio [RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.88; 4 RCTs, 806 participants; low-certainty evidence; note 1 study reported withdrawals due to adverse effects but recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 3 studies rather than 4). Four studies were at overall high risk of bias, and one study was at overall low risk of bias.

Authors' conclusions: In this systematic review, chronic daily intake of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants had little to no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, and withdrawals due to adverse effects. People making decisions about using these medicines should consider the very low certainty of evidence and the theoretical risk of increased blood pressure. Independent trials free from biases that are designed to answer this question are required. The evidence was limited due to the small number of studies, and the blood pressure and heart rate not being measured at the optimal time after drug ingestion.

肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血药对血压的影响。
背景:肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂通常每天长期服用以缓解鼻窦和鼻塞。减充血剂的作用机制可能会增加血压,这些影响可能是急性或慢性的。然而,尽管肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂广泛非处方使用,但迄今为止还没有系统的综述全面评估其作为一类药物对慢性血压的影响。目的:主要目的评价肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血药与安慰剂相比对收缩压和舒张压的影响。次要目的评价肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血药对心率和不良反应引起的停药的影响。检索方法:Cochrane高血压信息专家通过Cochrane Register of Studies、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov检索了以下随机对照试验(RCT)数据库:Cochrane高血压专科注册库、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)。没有语言、出版年份或出版状态的限制。选择标准:我们纳入了至少持续7天的随机对照试验,平行组(干预组和安慰剂组)比较肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂与安慰剂对6岁以上人群血压的影响。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者(JJC和MC)独立评估纳入的试验,提取数据,并评估纳入试验的偏倚风险。在有分歧的情况下,第三评论作者(JMW)裁决。对于研究中任何缺失或不清楚的信息,我们联系研究作者要求提供缺失信息或寻求澄清。主要结局是收缩压和舒张压。次要结局是心率和不良反应引起的停药。我们使用固定效应模型来结合所有研究的效应量。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。主要结果:5项随机对照试验共纳入882名受试者,符合纳入标准。最短的研究时间为1周,最长的研究时间为24周。这些研究测量了服用口服减充血剂一到七周后的血压和心率。最大的研究包括568人,最小的研究包括18人。参与者的平均年龄为20岁,其中男性326人,女性591人。这些研究在美国和欧洲进行;大多数故事发生在美国。制药公司资助了5项研究中的3项。该研究结果适用于所有使用肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂7天或更长时间的患者,无论是否有合并症或既往疾病。肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂包括麻黄碱(1项RCT)、伪麻黄碱(1项RCT)和苯丙醇胺(3项RCT)。与安慰剂相比,肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂可能对收缩压几乎没有影响,但证据非常不确定(平均差[MD] 0.91 mmHg, 95%可信区间[CI] -0.57至2.38;4项随机对照试验,784名受试者;I2 = 54%;非常低确定性证据)。肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂可能对舒张压几乎没有影响(MD 0.44 mmHg, 95% CI -0.59至1.48;5项随机对照试验,882名受试者;I2 = 30%;确定性的证据)。肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂可能对心率几乎没有影响,但证据非常不确定(MD 1.92次/分钟,95% CI -0.62至4.47;2项随机对照试验,190名受试者;I2 = 79%;非常低确定性证据)。肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂可能对因不良反应而停药的次数几乎没有影响(风险比[RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.37至3.88;4项随机对照试验,806名受试者;确定性的证据;注1研究报告了因不良反应而停药,但两组均未记录任何事件。因此,RR和CIs是从3项研究而不是4项研究中计算出来的。4项研究总体偏倚风险高,1项研究总体偏倚风险低。作者的结论是:在本系统综述中,长期每日摄入肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂对血压、心率和不良反应引起的停药几乎没有影响。决定使用这些药物的人应该考虑到证据的极低确定性和血压升高的理论风险。为回答这个问题而设计的无偏见的独立试验是必要的。由于研究数量少,且没有在服药后的最佳时间测量血压和心率,证据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信